Can Laguna XS 2.1 run on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
YES — With Offload
Laguna XS 2.1 needs ~24.3 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~26 tok/s.
Operating mode
Choose the run profile you care about
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
0.3 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization
Fit status
Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)
Decode
26.3 tok/s
TTFT
7365 ms
Safe context
9K
Memory
24.3 GB / 24.0 GB
Memory breakdown
See how fast it feels
What limits this setup
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Very little memory headroom
You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Best improvement path
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Buy headroom, not only minimum fit
A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.
Performance by workload
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | A | Runs with offload | 35.2 tok/s | 2999 ms | 9K |
| Coding | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 26.3 tok/s | 7365 ms | 9K |
| Agentic Coding | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM) | 25.0 tok/s | 11269 ms | 9K |
| Reasoning | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 26.3 tok/s | 8704 ms | 9K |
| RAG | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM) | 25.0 tok/s | 14087 ms | 9K |
Inference speed
Laguna XS 2.1 inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac
Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Laguna XS 2.1 at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~144 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.
| GPU / Mac | Memory | Quant | Speed (tok/s) | Fits? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 GB | Q4_K_M | 144.2 | Fits | |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 85.8 | Offloads | |
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB | 256 GB | Q4_K_M | 79.6 | Fits |
RX 7900 XTX 24GB | 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 72.3 | Offloads |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 68.5 | Offloads | |
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 66.3 | Fits |
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 62.9 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 49.2 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 49.2 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 37.7 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 34.6 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB | 48 GB | Q4_K_M | 33.1 | Fits |
| 16 GB | Q4_K_M | 31.3 | Too big | |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 10.9 | Too big | |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 6.4 | Too big | |
| 8 GB | Q4_K_M | 4.6 | Too big |
Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.
Quantization options
How Laguna XS 2.1 (33.400001525878906B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1_0_G128 | 1.125 | 4.8 GB | Very Low | A78 |
Q2_0_G128 | 1.71 | 8.9 GB | Low | A80 |
Q2_K | 2 | 13.0 GB | Low | A82 |
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU | 3 | 16.4 GB | Low | A81 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 18.7 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 20.4 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 24.0 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 27.4 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 35.7 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 68.5 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Get started
Copy-paste commands to run Laguna XS 2.1 on your machine.
Run
docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \
--hf-repo "poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1" \
--hf-file "Laguna-XS-2.1-Q4_K_M.gguf" \
-c 4096 -ngl 99Your hardware
More models your Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run
| Model | Params | Grade | Decode | Capabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35B | B | 16.6 tok/s | ||
| 35B | A | 21.9 tok/s | ||
| Agents-A1 35B A3B | 35.1B | A | 23.9 tok/s | |
| 34.7B | A | 24.6 tok/s |
Frequently asked questions
Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run Laguna XS 2.1?
Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run Laguna XS 2.1 with a A grade (Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 26.3 tok/s.
How much VRAM does Laguna XS 2.1 need?
Laguna XS 2.1 (33.400001525878906B parameters) requires approximately 24.3 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
What is the best quantization for Laguna XS 2.1?
The recommended quantization for Laguna XS 2.1 is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
What speed will Laguna XS 2.1 run at on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Laguna XS 2.1 achieves approximately 26.3 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 7365ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run Laguna XS 2.1 for coding?
For coding workloads, Laguna XS 2.1 on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a A grade with 26.3 tok/s and 9K context.
What context window can Laguna XS 2.1 use on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Laguna XS 2.1 can safely use up to 9K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 262K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
What should I upgrade first if Laguna XS 2.1 feels slow on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB for Laguna XS 2.1?
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Embed this result▼
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/laguna-xs-2.1-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: