Will It Run AI

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash run on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run
Estimated from fit model

DeepSeek V4 Flash needs ~169.8 GB but NVIDIA GH200 96GB only has 96.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

NVFP4 (Medium quality) 169.8 GB, exceeds 96.0 GB available
169.8 GB required96.0 GB available
177% VRAM needed

73.8 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

23.2 tok/s

TTFT

8333 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

169.8 GB / 96.0 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights158.0 GB
KV Cache1.3 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom9.6 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsDeepSeek V4 Flash on NVIDIA GH200 96GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 23.2 tok/s decode · 8.3s TTFT (warm) · 58 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 169.8 GB, but this setup only exposes 96.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy23.4 tok/s4517 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy23.2 tok/s8333 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy22.9 tok/s12276 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy23.2 tok/s9849 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy22.9 tok/s15345 ms4K

Quantization options

How DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA GH200 96GB (96.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
110.8 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
139.2 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
159.0 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
173.2 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
204.5 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
232.9 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
303.9 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
582.2 GB
MaximumF0

升级选项

能流畅运行 DeepSeek V4 Flash 的硬件

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run DeepSeek V4 Flash?

No, DeepSeek V4 Flash requires more memory than NVIDIA GH200 96GB provides.

How much VRAM does DeepSeek V4 Flash need?

DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B parameters) requires approximately 169.8 GB of memory with NVFP4 quantization.

What is the best quantization for DeepSeek V4 Flash?

The recommended quantization for DeepSeek V4 Flash is NVFP4, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will DeepSeek V4 Flash run at on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, DeepSeek V4 Flash achieves approximately 23.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 8333ms using NVFP4 quantization.

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run DeepSeek V4 Flash for coding?

For coding workloads, DeepSeek V4 Flash on NVIDIA GH200 96GB receives a F grade with 23.2 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can DeepSeek V4 Flash use on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, DeepSeek V4 Flash can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 1.0M, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if DeepSeek V4 Flash feels slow on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

See all results for NVIDIA GH200 96GBSee all hardware for DeepSeek V4 Flash
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/deepseek-v4-flash-on-gh200-96gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: