Can Codestral 2 25.08 run on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

A71Great

Estimated from fit model

Codestral 2 25.08 needs ~18.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~11 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 18.4 GB, 10.7 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~1.7 GB host RAM)

18.4 GB required16.0 GB available

115% VRAM needed

2.4 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~1.7 GB host RAM)

Decode

10.7 tok/s

TTFT

18176 ms

Safe context

Memory

18.4 GB / 16.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights13.4 GB

KV Cache2.4 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsCodestral 2 25.08 on Intel Arc A770 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 10.7 tok/s decode · 18.2s TTFT (warm) · 27 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	A	Runs with offload (needs ~0.9 GB host RAM)	12.3 tok/s	8578 ms	4K
Coding	A	Very compromised (needs ~1.7 GB host RAM)	10.7 tok/s	18176 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	8.2 tok/s	34384 ms	4K
Reasoning	A	Very compromised (needs ~1.7 GB host RAM)	10.7 tok/s	21481 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	8.2 tok/s	42980 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Codestral 2 25.08 (22B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A770 16GB (16.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	8.6 GB	Low	S86
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU	3	10.8 GB	Low	S85
NVFP4	4	12.3 GB	Medium	F0
Q4_K_M	4	13.4 GB	Medium	F0
Q5_K_M	5	15.8 GB	High	F0
Q6_K	6	18.0 GB	High	F0
Q8_0	8	23.5 GB	Very High	F0
F16	16	45.1 GB	Maximum	F0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Codestral 2 25.08 on your machine.

Run

lms load codestral-2508 && lms server start

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Codestral 2 25.08?

Yes, Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Codestral 2 25.08 with a A grade (Very compromised (needs ~1.7 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 10.7 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Codestral 2 25.08 need?

Codestral 2 25.08 (22B parameters) requires approximately 18.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Codestral 2 25.08?

The recommended quantization for Codestral 2 25.08 is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Codestral 2 25.08 run at on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Codestral 2 25.08 achieves approximately 10.7 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 18176ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Codestral 2 25.08 for coding?

For coding workloads, Codestral 2 25.08 on Intel Arc A770 16GB receives a A grade with 10.7 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Codestral 2 25.08 use on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Codestral 2 25.08 can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 256K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Codestral 2 25.08 feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A770 16GB for Codestral 2 25.08?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc A770 16GB See all hardware for Codestral 2 25.08

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/codestral-2-25.08-on-arc-a770-16gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: