Will It Run AI

Can Qwen 2.5 Math 72B run on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

C49Usable
Estimated from fit model

Qwen 2.5 Math 72B needs ~54.5 GB VRAM. Radeon Pro W7900 48GB has 48.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~7 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 54.5 GB, 7.2 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~5.2 GB host RAM)
54.5 GB required48.0 GB available
114% VRAM needed

6.5 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~5.2 GB host RAM)

Decode

7.2 tok/s

TTFT

26721 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

54.5 GB / 48.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights43.9 GB
KV Cache4.9 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom4.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsQwen 2.5 Math 72B on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 7.2 tok/s decode · 26.7s TTFT (warm) · 18 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 5.2 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatCVery compromised (needs ~3.4 GB host RAM)8.0 tok/s13235 ms4K
CodingCVery compromised (needs ~5.2 GB host RAM)7.2 tok/s26721 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy6.0 tok/s46561 ms4K
ReasoningCVery compromised (needs ~5.2 GB host RAM)7.2 tok/s31580 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy6.0 tok/s58202 ms4K

Quantization options

How Qwen 2.5 Math 72B (72B params) fits at each quantization level on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB (48.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
28.1 GB
LowB61
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU
3
35.3 GB
LowB61
NVFP4
4
40.3 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
43.9 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
51.8 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
59.0 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
77.0 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
147.6 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 2.5 Math 72B on your machine.

Run

docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \ --hf-repo "Qwen/Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct" \ --hf-file "Qwen2.5-Math-72B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf" \ -c 4096 -ngl 99

Opções de upgrade

Hardware que roda bem Qwen 2.5 Math 72B

Frequently asked questions

Can Radeon Pro W7900 48GB run Qwen 2.5 Math 72B?

Yes, Radeon Pro W7900 48GB can run Qwen 2.5 Math 72B with a C grade (Very compromised (needs ~5.2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 7.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Qwen 2.5 Math 72B need?

Qwen 2.5 Math 72B (72B parameters) requires approximately 54.5 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Qwen 2.5 Math 72B?

The recommended quantization for Qwen 2.5 Math 72B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Qwen 2.5 Math 72B run at on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB?

On Radeon Pro W7900 48GB, Qwen 2.5 Math 72B achieves approximately 7.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 26721ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Radeon Pro W7900 48GB run Qwen 2.5 Math 72B for coding?

For coding workloads, Qwen 2.5 Math 72B on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB receives a C grade with 7.2 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Qwen 2.5 Math 72B use on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB?

On Radeon Pro W7900 48GB, Qwen 2.5 Math 72B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 4K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Qwen 2.5 Math 72B feels slow on Radeon Pro W7900 48GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for Radeon Pro W7900 48GBSee all hardware for Qwen 2.5 Math 72B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-2.5-math-72b-on-radeon-pro-w7900-48gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: