willitrun·ai

Can Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B run on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

B67Good
Estimated from fit model

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B needs ~26.7 GB VRAM. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~19 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 26.7 GB, 19.2 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~2 GB host RAM)
26.7 GB required24.0 GB available
111% VRAM needed

2.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~2 GB host RAM)

Decode

19.2 tok/s

TTFT

10096 ms

Safe context

5K

Memory

26.7 GB / 24.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights19.5 GB
KV Cache3.9 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom2.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 19.2 tok/s decode · 10.1s TTFT (warm) · 48 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 2.0 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatARuns with offload (needs ~0.6 GB host RAM)22.4 tok/s4717 ms5K
CodingBVery compromised (needs ~2 GB host RAM)19.2 tok/s10096 ms5K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy14.5 tok/s19397 ms5K
ReasoningBVery compromised (needs ~2 GB host RAM)19.2 tok/s11931 ms5K
RAGFToo heavy14.5 tok/s24246 ms5K

Inference speed

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~66 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M66.4Tight
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M33.2Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M33.2Fits
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M30.8Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M25.7Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M24.8Heavy offload
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M24.3Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M22.9Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M21.2Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M20.9Tight
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M13.3Fits
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M12.2Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M9.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M3.1Too big
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (32B params) fits at each quantization level on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB (24.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
12.5 GB
LowA78
Q3_K_S
3
15.7 GB
LowA77
NVFP4Best for your GPU
4
17.9 GB
MediumA77
Q4_K_M
4
19.5 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
23.0 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
26.2 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
34.2 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
65.6 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on your machine.

Run

ollama run qwen2.5-coder

Opções de upgrade

Hardware que roda bem Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Frequently asked questions

Can RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?

Yes, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB can run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B with a B grade (Very compromised (needs ~2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 19.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B need?

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (32B parameters) requires approximately 26.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?

The recommended quantization for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B run at on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB?

On RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B achieves approximately 19.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 10096ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B for coding?

For coding workloads, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB receives a B grade with 19.2 tok/s and 5K context.

What context window can Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B use on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB?

On RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B can safely use up to 5K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B feels slow on RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24GBSee all hardware for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-on-rtx-pro-4000-blackwell-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: