willitrun·ai

Can Phi 3 Medium 14B run on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

YES — Runs Great

B63Good
Estimated from fit model

Phi 3 Medium 14B needs ~14.9 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~31 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 14.9 GB, 31.0 tok/s, Runs well
14.9 GB required24.0 GB available
62% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

31.0 tok/s

TTFT

6246 ms

Safe context

64K

Memory

14.9 GB / 24.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights8.5 GB
KV Cache3.1 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom2.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsPhi 3 Medium 14B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 31.0 tok/s decode · 6.2s TTFT (warm) · 78 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatBRuns well31.0 tok/s3407 ms64K
CodingBRuns well31.0 tok/s6246 ms64K
Agentic CodingBRuns well31.0 tok/s9085 ms64K
ReasoningBRuns well31.0 tok/s7382 ms64K
RAGBRuns well31.0 tok/s11356 ms64K

Inference speed

Phi 3 Medium 14B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Phi 3 Medium 14B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~151 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M151.1Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M96.4Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M87.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M82.5Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M80.7Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M70.1Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M58.4Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M55.4Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M38.1Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M38.1Fits
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M30.2Fits
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M28.4Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M27.7Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M23.3Fits
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M16.7Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M6.1Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Phi 3 Medium 14B (14B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
5.5 GB
LowB57
Q3_K_S
3
6.9 GB
LowB58
NVFP4
4
7.8 GB
MediumB58
Q4_K_M
4
8.5 GB
MediumB59
Q5_K_M
5
10.1 GB
HighB60
Q6_K
6
11.5 GB
HighB61
Q8_0Best for your GPU
8
15.0 GB
Very HighB61
F16
16
28.7 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Phi 3 Medium 14B on your machine.

Run

ollama run phi3:medium

Opções de upgrade

Hardware que roda bem Phi 3 Medium 14B

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run Phi 3 Medium 14B?

Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run Phi 3 Medium 14B with a B grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 31.0 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Phi 3 Medium 14B need?

Phi 3 Medium 14B (14B parameters) requires approximately 14.9 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Phi 3 Medium 14B?

The recommended quantization for Phi 3 Medium 14B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Phi 3 Medium 14B run at on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Phi 3 Medium 14B achieves approximately 31.0 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 6246ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run Phi 3 Medium 14B for coding?

For coding workloads, Phi 3 Medium 14B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a B grade with 31.0 tok/s and 64K context.

What context window can Phi 3 Medium 14B use on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Phi 3 Medium 14B can safely use up to 64K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 128K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Phi 3 Medium 14B feels slow on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB for Phi 3 Medium 14B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc Pro B60 24GBSee all hardware for Phi 3 Medium 14B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/phi-3-medium-14b-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: