Raises estimated decode speed by about 58%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$349 MSRP
GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT needs ~12.3 GB VRAM. Intel Arc B580 12GB has 12.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~19 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
0.3 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization
Fit status
Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)
Decode
18.7 tok/s
TTFT
10355 ms
Safe context
13K
Memory
12.3 GB / 12.0 GB
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Very little memory headroom
You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Buy headroom, not only minimum fit
A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs with offload | 25.6 tok/s | 4120 ms | 13K |
| Coding | C | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 18.7 tok/s | 10355 ms | 13K |
| Agentic Coding | D | Very compromised (needs ~1.2 GB host RAM) | 14.5 tok/s | 19452 ms | 13K |
| Reasoning | C | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 18.7 tok/s | 12238 ms | 13K |
| RAG | D | Very compromised (needs ~1.2 GB host RAM) | 14.5 tok/s | 24315 ms | 13K |
How GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT (14B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B580 12GB (12.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 5.5 GB | Low | C52 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 6.9 GB | Low | C52 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 7.8 GB | Medium | C51 |
Q4_K_MBest for your GPU | 4 | 8.5 GB | Medium | C51 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 10.1 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 11.5 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 15.0 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 28.7 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Copy-paste commands to run GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT on your machine.
Run
lms load hf-srs6901--gguf-solarized-granistral-14b-1902-yeam-hct && lms server startOpções de upgrade
Raises estimated decode speed by about 58%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$349 MSRP
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$399 MSRP
Raises estimated decode speed by about 54%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$599 MSRP
Yes, Intel Arc B580 12GB can run GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT with a C grade (Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 18.7 tok/s.
GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT (14B parameters) requires approximately 12.3 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Intel Arc B580 12GB, GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT achieves approximately 18.7 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 10355ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT on Intel Arc B580 12GB receives a C grade with 18.7 tok/s and 13K context.
On Intel Arc B580 12GB, GGUF SOLARized GraniStral 14B 1902 YeAM HCT can safely use up to 13K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-srs6901--gguf-solarized-granistral-14b-1902-yeam-hct-on-arc-b580-12gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: