Will It Run AI

Can Granite Code 34B run on NVIDIA A10 24GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

B65Good
Estimated from fit model

Granite Code 34B needs ~27.7 GB VRAM. NVIDIA A10 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~14 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 27.7 GB, 13.6 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~2.8 GB host RAM)
27.7 GB required24.0 GB available
115% VRAM needed

3.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~2.8 GB host RAM)

Decode

13.6 tok/s

TTFT

14282 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

27.7 GB / 24.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights20.7 GB
KV Cache3.7 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom2.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsGranite Code 34B on NVIDIA A10 24GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 13.6 tok/s decode · 14.3s TTFT (warm) · 34 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 2.8 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatBRuns with offload (needs ~1.5 GB host RAM)15.7 tok/s6746 ms4K
CodingBVery compromised (needs ~2.8 GB host RAM)13.6 tok/s14282 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy10.4 tok/s26979 ms4K
ReasoningBVery compromised (needs ~2.8 GB host RAM)13.6 tok/s16879 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy10.4 tok/s33723 ms4K

Quantization options

How Granite Code 34B (34B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA A10 24GB (24.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
13.3 GB
LowA77
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU
3
16.7 GB
LowA76
NVFP4
4
19.0 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
20.7 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
24.5 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
27.9 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
36.4 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
69.7 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Granite Code 34B on your machine.

Run

ollama run granite-code:34b

Opções de upgrade

Hardware que roda bem Granite Code 34B

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA A10 24GB run Granite Code 34B?

Yes, NVIDIA A10 24GB can run Granite Code 34B with a B grade (Very compromised (needs ~2.8 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 13.6 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Granite Code 34B need?

Granite Code 34B (34B parameters) requires approximately 27.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Granite Code 34B?

The recommended quantization for Granite Code 34B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Granite Code 34B run at on NVIDIA A10 24GB?

On NVIDIA A10 24GB, Granite Code 34B achieves approximately 13.6 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 14282ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can NVIDIA A10 24GB run Granite Code 34B for coding?

For coding workloads, Granite Code 34B on NVIDIA A10 24GB receives a B grade with 13.6 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Granite Code 34B use on NVIDIA A10 24GB?

On NVIDIA A10 24GB, Granite Code 34B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Granite Code 34B feels slow on NVIDIA A10 24GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for NVIDIA A10 24GBSee all hardware for Granite Code 34B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/granite-code-34b-on-a10-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview:

Granite Code 34B on NVIDIA A10 24GB? YES