Can 1-bit Bonsai 27B run on Intel Arc A380 6GB?
YES — With Offload
1-bit Bonsai 27B needs ~6.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A380 6GB has 6.0 GB. With Q1_0_G128 quantization, expect ~13 tok/s.
Operating mode
Choose the run profile you care about
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
0.4 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization
Fit status
Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)
Decode
13.4 tok/s
TTFT
14463 ms
Safe context
10K
Memory
6.4 GB / 6.0 GB
Offload
10%
Memory breakdown
See how fast it feels
What limits this setup
It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.
CPU or host-memory offload is active
About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.
Very little memory headroom
You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Best improvement path
Remove offload with more accelerator memory
Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Buy headroom, not only minimum fit
A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.
Performance by workload
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | A | Runs with offload | 20.2 tok/s | 5226 ms | 10K |
| Coding | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 13.4 tok/s | 14463 ms | 10K |
| Agentic Coding | F | Too heavy | 9.9 tok/s | 28410 ms | 10K |
| Reasoning | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM) | 13.4 tok/s | 17092 ms | 10K |
| RAG | F | Too heavy | 9.9 tok/s | 35512 ms | 10K |
Inference speed
1-bit Bonsai 27B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac
Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for 1-bit Bonsai 27B at Q1_0_G128 across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~156 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.
| GPU / Mac | Memory | Quant | Speed (tok/s) | Fits? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 156.1 | Fits | |
RX 7900 XTX 24GB | 24 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 132.5 | Fits |
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB | 256 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 123.5 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB | 128 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 122.1 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 122.1 | Fits |
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 102.9 | Fits |
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 97.6 | Fits |
| 24 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 89.7 | Fits | |
| 24 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 87.4 | Fits | |
| 16 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 86.1 | Fits | |
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB | 48 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 76.9 | Fits |
| 12 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 69.5 | Fits | |
| 12 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 53.3 | Fits | |
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 53.2 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 48.8 | Fits |
| 8 GB | Q1_0_G128 | 28.0 | Tight |
Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q1_0_G128; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.
Quantization options
How 1-bit Bonsai 27B (27B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A380 6GB (6.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1_0_G128 | 1.125 | 3.9 GB | Very Low | F0 |
Q2_0_G128 | 1.71 | 7.2 GB | Low | F0 |
Q2_K | 2 | 10.5 GB | Low | F0 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 13.2 GB | Low | F0 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 15.1 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 16.5 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 19.4 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 22.1 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 28.9 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 55.4 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Get started
Copy-paste commands to run 1-bit Bonsai 27B on your machine.
Run
docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \
--hf-repo "prism-ml/Bonsai-27B-gguf" \
--hf-file "Bonsai-27B-gguf-Q1_0_G128.gguf" \
-c 4096 -ngl 99Frequently asked questions
Can Intel Arc A380 6GB run 1-bit Bonsai 27B?
Yes, Intel Arc A380 6GB can run 1-bit Bonsai 27B with a A grade (Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 13.4 tok/s.
How much VRAM does 1-bit Bonsai 27B need?
1-bit Bonsai 27B (27B parameters) requires approximately 6.4 GB of memory with Q1_0_G128 quantization.
What is the best quantization for 1-bit Bonsai 27B?
The recommended quantization for 1-bit Bonsai 27B is Q1_0_G128, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
What speed will 1-bit Bonsai 27B run at on Intel Arc A380 6GB?
On Intel Arc A380 6GB, 1-bit Bonsai 27B achieves approximately 13.4 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 14463ms using Q1_0_G128 quantization.
Can Intel Arc A380 6GB run 1-bit Bonsai 27B for coding?
For coding workloads, 1-bit Bonsai 27B on Intel Arc A380 6GB receives a A grade with 13.4 tok/s and 10K context.
What context window can 1-bit Bonsai 27B use on Intel Arc A380 6GB?
On Intel Arc A380 6GB, 1-bit Bonsai 27B can safely use up to 10K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 262K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
What should I upgrade first if 1-bit Bonsai 27B feels slow on Intel Arc A380 6GB?
Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.
Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A380 6GB for 1-bit Bonsai 27B?
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Embed this result▼
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/bonsai-27b-on-arc-a380-6gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: