Can Phi-4 14B run on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

B70Good
Estimated from fit model

Phi-4 14B needs ~13.7 GB VRAM. Intel Arc B580 12GB has 12.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~16 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 13.7 GB, 16.1 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~1.1 GB host RAM)
13.7 GB required12.0 GB available
114% VRAM needed

1.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~1.1 GB host RAM)

Decode

16.1 tok/s

TTFT

12025 ms

Safe context

7K

Memory

13.7 GB / 12.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights8.5 GB
KV Cache3.1 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.2 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsPhi-4 14B on Intel Arc B580 12GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 16.1 tok/s decode · 12.0s TTFT (warm) · 40 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatARuns with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM)20.5 tok/s5154 ms7K
CodingBVery compromised (needs ~1.1 GB host RAM)16.1 tok/s12025 ms7K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy10.7 tok/s26369 ms7K
ReasoningBVery compromised (needs ~1.1 GB host RAM)16.1 tok/s14212 ms7K
RAGFToo heavy10.7 tok/s32962 ms7K

Inference speed

Phi-4 14B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Phi-4 14B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~151 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M151.1Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M96.4Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M87.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M82.5Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M80.7Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M70.1Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M58.4Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M55.4Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M38.1Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M38.1Fits
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M30.2Fits
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M28.4Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M27.7Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M23.3Fits
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M16.7Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M6.1Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Phi-4 14B (14B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B580 12GB (12.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
5.5 GB
LowA84
Q3_K_S
3
6.9 GB
LowA84
NVFP4
4
7.8 GB
MediumA83
Q4_K_MBest for your GPU
4
8.5 GB
MediumA83
Q5_K_M
5
10.1 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
11.5 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
15.0 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
28.7 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Phi-4 14B on your machine.

Run

ollama run phi4

アップグレードオプション

Phi-4 14Bを快適に動かすハードウェア

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc B580 12GB run Phi-4 14B?

Yes, Intel Arc B580 12GB can run Phi-4 14B with a B grade (Very compromised (needs ~1.1 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 16.1 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Phi-4 14B need?

Phi-4 14B (14B parameters) requires approximately 13.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Phi-4 14B?

The recommended quantization for Phi-4 14B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Phi-4 14B run at on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

On Intel Arc B580 12GB, Phi-4 14B achieves approximately 16.1 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 12025ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc B580 12GB run Phi-4 14B for coding?

For coding workloads, Phi-4 14B on Intel Arc B580 12GB receives a B grade with 16.1 tok/s and 7K context.

What context window can Phi-4 14B use on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

On Intel Arc B580 12GB, Phi-4 14B can safely use up to 7K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 16K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Phi-4 14B feels slow on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc B580 12GB for Phi-4 14B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc B580 12GBSee all hardware for Phi-4 14B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/phi-4-14b-on-arc-b580-12gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: