Can starcoder2 15b i1 run on Intel Arc A730M 12GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

D37Poor

Estimated from fit model

starcoder2 15b i1 needs ~13.0 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A730M 12GB has 12.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~11 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.0 GB, 11.4 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM)

13.0 GB required12.0 GB available

108% VRAM needed

1.0 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM)

Decode

11.4 tok/s

TTFT

17000 ms

Safe context

Memory

13.0 GB / 12.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights9.2 GB

KV Cache1.8 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.2 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsstarcoder2 15b i1 on Intel Arc A730M 12GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 11.4 tok/s decode · 17.0s TTFT (warm) · 29 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Runs with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM)	13.2 tok/s	8003 ms	7K
Coding	D	Very compromised (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM)	11.4 tok/s	17000 ms	7K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	8.7 tok/s	32289 ms	7K
Reasoning	D	Very compromised (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM)	11.4 tok/s	20091 ms	7K
RAG	F	Too heavy	8.7 tok/s	40361 ms	7K

Inference speed

starcoder2 15b i1 inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for starcoder2 15b i1 at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~131 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / Mac	Memory	Quant	Speed (tok/s)	Fits?
RTX 5090 32GB	32 GB	Q4_K_M	131.2	Fits
RTX 4090 24GB	24 GB	Q4_K_M	83.7	Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB	24 GB	Q4_K_M	75.5	Fits
RTX 3090 24GB	24 GB	Q4_K_M	71.6	Fits
RTX 4080 Super 16GB	16 GB	Q4_K_M	68.3	Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB	256 GB	Q4_K_M	60.9	Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB	128 GB	Q4_K_M	50.7	Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB	128 GB	Q4_K_M	48.1	Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB	128 GB	Q4_K_M	34.7	Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB	64 GB	Q4_K_M	34.7	Fits
RTX 4070 12GB	12 GB	Q4_K_M	26.7	Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB	64 GB	Q4_K_M	26.2	Fits
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB	64 GB	Q4_K_M	24.0	Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB	48 GB	Q4_K_M	21.2	Fits
RTX 3060 12GB	12 GB	Q4_K_M	15.7	Heavy offload
RTX 4060 8GB	8 GB	Q4_K_M	5.9	Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How starcoder2 15b i1 (15B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A730M 12GB (12.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	5.9 GB	Low	C52
Q3_K_S	3	7.4 GB	Low	C51
NVFP4Best for your GPU	4	8.4 GB	Medium	C51
Q4_K_M	4	9.2 GB	Medium	F0
Q5_K_M	5	10.8 GB	High	F0
Q6_K	6	12.3 GB	High	F0
Q8_0	8	16.1 GB	Very High	F0
F16	16	30.7 GB	Maximum	F0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run starcoder2 15b i1 on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-mradermacher--starcoder2-15b-i1-gguf && lms server start

アップグレードオプション

starcoder2 15b i1を快適に動かすハードウェア

Intel Arc A770 16GBコスパ重視

16 GB VRAM (+4)560 GB/s (+224)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.27.5 tok/sデコード

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 141%.

〜$349 MSRP

Intel Arc Pro B50 16GBコスパ最良

16 GB VRAM (+4)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.13.2 tok/sデコード

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

〜$399 MSRP

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GBIntelアップグレード

24 GB VRAM (+12)456 GB/s (+120)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.26.9 tok/sデコード

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 136%.

〜$599 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A730M 12GB run starcoder2 15b i1?

Yes, Intel Arc A730M 12GB can run starcoder2 15b i1 with a D grade (Very compromised (needs ~0.7 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 11.4 tok/s.

How much VRAM does starcoder2 15b i1 need?

starcoder2 15b i1 (15B parameters) requires approximately 13.0 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for starcoder2 15b i1?

The recommended quantization for starcoder2 15b i1 is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will starcoder2 15b i1 run at on Intel Arc A730M 12GB?

On Intel Arc A730M 12GB, starcoder2 15b i1 achieves approximately 11.4 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 17000ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A730M 12GB run starcoder2 15b i1 for coding?

For coding workloads, starcoder2 15b i1 on Intel Arc A730M 12GB receives a D grade with 11.4 tok/s and 7K context.

What context window can starcoder2 15b i1 use on Intel Arc A730M 12GB?

On Intel Arc A730M 12GB, starcoder2 15b i1 can safely use up to 7K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if starcoder2 15b i1 feels slow on Intel Arc A730M 12GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A730M 12GB for starcoder2 15b i1?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc A730M 12GB See all hardware for starcoder2 15b i1

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-mradermacher--starcoder2-15b-i1-gguf-on-arc-a730m-12gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: