Can Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 run on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB?

YES — With Q3_K_S

D36Poor
Estimated from fit model

Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 needs ~14.4 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB has 13.0 GB. With Q3_K_S quantization, expect ~9 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 at Q4_K_M needs 16.7 GB — too much for MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB (13.0 GB). Runs at Q3_K_S (14.4 GB) with low quality. 2 quantization levels fit.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 16.7 GB, exceeds 13.0 GB available
16.7 GB required13.0 GB available
128% VRAM needed

3.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

6.6 tok/s

TTFT

29278 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

16.7 GB / 13.0 GB

Offload

20%

Memory breakdown

Weights11.6 GB
KV Cache2.2 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.9 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsCodestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 6.6 tok/s decode · 29.3s TTFT (warm) · 17 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 0.9 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatDVery compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)7.2 tok/s14672 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy6.6 tok/s29278 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy5.7 tok/s49321 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy6.6 tok/s34601 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy5.7 tok/s61652 ms4K

Quantization options

How Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 (19B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB (13.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
7.4 GB
LowC51
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU
3
9.3 GB
LowC51
NVFP4
4
10.6 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
11.6 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
13.7 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
15.6 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
20.3 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
38.9 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-mradermacher--codestral-rag-19b-pruned-i1-gguf && lms server start

アップグレードオプション

Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1を快適に動かすハードウェア

Frequently asked questions

Can MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB run Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1?

Yes, MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB can run Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 at Q3_K_S quantization (Very compromised (needs ~0.9 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 16.7 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q3_K_S it needs only 14.4 GB. Expected decode speed: 9.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 need?

Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 (19B parameters) requires approximately 16.7 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB, it fits at Q3_K_S using 14.4 GB.

What is the best quantization for Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB the best fitting quantization is Q3_K_S, which uses 14.4 GB.

What speed will Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 run at on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB?

On MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB, Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 achieves approximately 9.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 20994ms using Q3_K_S quantization.

Can MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB run Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 for coding?

For coding workloads, Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB receives a F grade with 6.6 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 use on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB?

On MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB, Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 can safely use up to 6K tokens of context at Q3_K_S quantization. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1 feels slow on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Is unified memory on MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB as fast as VRAM for Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1?

Not always. MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.

See all results for MacBook Pro M3 Pro 18GBSee all hardware for Codestral RAG 19B Pruned i1
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-mradermacher--codestral-rag-19b-pruned-i1-gguf-on-m3-pro-18gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: