〜$1,999 MSRP
Can EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct run on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
YES — Runs Great
EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct needs ~5.0 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~34 tok/s.
Operating mode
Choose the run profile you care about
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
33.6 tok/s
TTFT
5762 ms
Safe context
1.1M
Memory
5.0 GB / 24.0 GB
Memory breakdown
See how fast it feels
What limits this setup
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Best improvement path
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Performance by workload
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs well | 33.6 tok/s | 3143 ms | 1.1M |
| Coding | C | Runs well | 33.6 tok/s | 5762 ms | 1.1M |
| Agentic Coding | C | Runs well | 33.6 tok/s | 8381 ms | 1.1M |
| Reasoning | C | Runs well | 33.6 tok/s | 6810 ms | 1.1M |
| RAG | C | Runs well | 33.6 tok/s | 10476 ms | 1.1M |
Quantization options
How EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct (2.4000000953674316B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 0.9 GB | Low | C43 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 1.2 GB | Low | C44 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 1.3 GB | Medium | C44 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 1.5 GB | Medium | C44 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 1.7 GB | High | C44 |
Q6_K | 6 | 2.0 GB | High | C44 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 2.6 GB | Very High | C44 |
F16Best for your GPU | 16 | 4.9 GB | Maximum | C45 |
Get started
Copy-paste commands to run EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct on your machine.
Run
lms load hf-lmstudio-community--exaone-3-5-2-4b-instruct-gguf && lms server startアップグレードオプション
EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instructを快適に動かすハードウェア
Raises estimated decode speed by about 36%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
This is not only a hardware jump. It also gives you a cleaner runtime ecosystem for local LLM tooling.
〜$1,999 MSRP
Frequently asked questions
Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct?
Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 33.6 tok/s.
How much VRAM does EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct need?
EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct (2.4000000953674316B parameters) requires approximately 5.0 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
What is the best quantization for EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct?
The recommended quantization for EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
What speed will EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct run at on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct achieves approximately 33.6 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 5762ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct for coding?
For coding workloads, EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a C grade with 33.6 tok/s and 1.1M context.
What context window can EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct use on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct can safely use up to 1.1M tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
What should I upgrade first if EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct feels slow on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB for EXAONE 3.5 2.4B Instruct?
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Embed this result▼
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-lmstudio-community--exaone-3-5-2-4b-instruct-gguf-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: