Can GLM-4 9B run on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB?

YES — Runs Great

A70Great
Estimated from fit model

GLM-4 9B needs ~8.6 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB has 16.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~24 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory bandwidth
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 8.6 GB, 24.1 tok/s, Runs well
8.6 GB required16.0 GB available
54% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

24.1 tok/s

TTFT

8034 ms

Safe context

128K

Memory

8.6 GB / 16.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights5.5 GB
KV Cache0.6 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsGLM-4 9B on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API. When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed. Key benefits of running locally: - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine - No per-token cost or rate limits - Works offline once the model is downloaded - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb: Model size Q4 (4-bit) Q8 (8-bit) FP16 7B params ~4.3 GB ~7.5 GB ~14 GB 13B params ~7.9 GB ~13.9 GB ~26 GB 70B params ~42.7 GB ~74.9 GB ~140 GB Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 24.1 tok/s decode · 8.0s TTFT (warm) · 60 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatARuns well24.1 tok/s4382 ms128K
CodingARuns well24.1 tok/s8034 ms128K
Agentic CodingARuns well24.1 tok/s11685 ms128K
ReasoningARuns well24.1 tok/s9494 ms128K
RAGARuns well24.1 tok/s14607 ms128K

Inference speed

GLM-4 9B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for GLM-4 9B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~126 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M126.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M126.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M126.0Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M126.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M121.7Fits
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M111.0Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M92.4Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M87.7Fits
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M75.3Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M74.7Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M74.7Fits
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M47.8Fits
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M47.3Fits
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M43.8Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M38.5Fits
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M36.4Offloads

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How GLM-4 9B (9B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB (16.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
3.5 GB
LowB69
Q3_K_S
3
4.4 GB
LowB70
NVFP4
4
5.0 GB
MediumA70
Q4_K_M
4
5.5 GB
MediumA71
Q5_K_M
5
6.5 GB
HighA72
Q6_K
6
7.4 GB
HighA73
Q8_0Best for your GPU
8
9.6 GB
Very HighA73
F16
16
18.5 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run GLM-4 9B on your machine.

Run

ollama run glm4

Your hardware

More models your Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB can run

ModelParamsGradeDecodeCapabilities
AlibabaQwen 3 14B14BS15.3 tok/s
MicrosoftPhi-4-reasoning-plus 14B14.7BS14.5 tok/s
OpenAIGPT-OSS 20B21BA14.4 tok/s
MistralMinistral 3 14B14BA15.2 tok/s
MistralCodestral 2 25.0822BB5.3 tok/s

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB run GLM-4 9B?

Yes, Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB can run GLM-4 9B with a A grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 24.1 tok/s.

How much VRAM does GLM-4 9B need?

GLM-4 9B (9B parameters) requires approximately 8.6 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for GLM-4 9B?

The recommended quantization for GLM-4 9B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will GLM-4 9B run at on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB, GLM-4 9B achieves approximately 24.1 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 8034ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB run GLM-4 9B for coding?

For coding workloads, GLM-4 9B on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB receives a A grade with 24.1 tok/s and 128K context.

What context window can GLM-4 9B use on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB, GLM-4 9B can safely use up to 128K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 128K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if GLM-4 9B feels slow on Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro B50 16GB for GLM-4 9B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc Pro B50 16GBSee all hardware for GLM-4 9B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/glm-4-9b-on-arc-pro-b50-16gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: