Can Command A 111B run on NVIDIA A16 64GB?

YES — With NVFP4

A75Great
Estimated from fit model

Command A 111B needs ~73.4 GB VRAM. NVIDIA A16 64GB has 64.0 GB. With NVFP4 quantization, expect ~5 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Command A 111B at Q4_K_M needs 78.9 GB — too much for NVIDIA A16 64GB (64.0 GB). Runs at NVFP4 (73.4 GB) with medium quality. 3 quantization levels fit.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 78.9 GB, exceeds 64.0 GB available
78.9 GB required64.0 GB available
123% VRAM needed

14.9 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.6 tok/s

TTFT

53173 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

78.9 GB / 64.0 GB

Offload

20%

Memory breakdown

Weights67.7 GB
KV Cache3.9 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.4 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsCommand A 111B on NVIDIA A16 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 3.6 tok/s decode · 53.2s TTFT (warm) · 9 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 7.9 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy3.8 tok/s27513 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy3.6 tok/s53173 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy3.3 tok/s85621 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy3.6 tok/s62840 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy3.3 tok/s107027 ms4K

Inference speed

Command A 111B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Command A 111B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, including multi-GPU rigs, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB at ~10 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M9.7Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M9.0Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M7.5Tight
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M7.1Tight
2× RX 7900 XTX 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M5.2Too big
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M4.8Too big
NVIDIA2× RTX 4090 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M3.7Too big
NVIDIA2× RTX 3090 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M3.1Too big
NVIDIA4× RTX 3060 12GB
48 GBQ4_K_M2.8Too big
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M2.7Too big
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Command A 111B (111B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA A16 64GB (64.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_KBest for your GPU
2
43.3 GB
LowS88
Q3_K_S
3
54.4 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
62.2 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
67.7 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
79.9 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
91.0 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
118.8 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
227.6 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Command A 111B on your machine.

Run

ollama run command-a

アップグレードオプション

Command A 111Bを快適に動かすハードウェア

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA A16 64GB run Command A 111B?

Yes, NVIDIA A16 64GB can run Command A 111B at NVFP4 quantization (Very compromised (needs ~7.9 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 78.9 GB which exceeds available memory, but at NVFP4 it needs only 73.4 GB. Expected decode speed: 4.9 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Command A 111B need?

Command A 111B (111B parameters) requires approximately 78.9 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On NVIDIA A16 64GB, it fits at NVFP4 using 73.4 GB.

What is the best quantization for Command A 111B?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on NVIDIA A16 64GB the best fitting quantization is NVFP4, which uses 73.4 GB.

What speed will Command A 111B run at on NVIDIA A16 64GB?

On NVIDIA A16 64GB, Command A 111B achieves approximately 4.9 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 39874ms using NVFP4 quantization.

Can NVIDIA A16 64GB run Command A 111B for coding?

For coding workloads, Command A 111B on NVIDIA A16 64GB receives a F grade with 3.6 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Command A 111B use on NVIDIA A16 64GB?

On NVIDIA A16 64GB, Command A 111B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context at NVFP4 quantization. The model's official context limit is 262K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Command A 111B feels slow on NVIDIA A16 64GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for NVIDIA A16 64GBSee all hardware for Command A 111B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/command-a-111b-on-a16-64gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: