willitrun·ai

Can Qwen3-Coder-Next run on NVIDIA V100 32GB?

YES — With Q2_K

A81Great
Estimated from fit model

Qwen3-Coder-Next needs ~37.1 GB VRAM. NVIDIA V100 32GB has 32.0 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~36 tok/s.

Runtime: OllamaCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: HighStack: BasicBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Qwen3-Coder-Next at Q4_K_M needs 54.7 GB — too much for NVIDIA V100 32GB (32.0 GB). Runs at Q2_K (37.1 GB) with low quality.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 54.7 GB, exceeds 32.0 GB available
54.7 GB required32.0 GB available
171% VRAM needed

22.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

14.4 tok/s

TTFT

13486 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

54.7 GB / 32.0 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights48.8 GB
KV Cache1.5 GB
Runtime1.2 GB
Headroom3.2 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsQwen3-Coder-Next on NVIDIA V100 32GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 14.4 tok/s decode · 13.5s TTFT (warm) · 36 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 4.3 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy14.7 tok/s7194 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy14.4 tok/s13486 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy13.7 tok/s20491 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy14.4 tok/s15938 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy13.7 tok/s25614 ms4K

Inference speed

Qwen3-Coder-Next inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Qwen3-Coder-Next at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, including multi-GPU rigs, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB at ~49 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M48.9Fits
2× RX 7900 XTX 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M43.1Heavy offload
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M40.7Fits
NVIDIA2× RTX 4090 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M39.3Heavy offload
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M38.6Fits
NVIDIA2× RTX 3090 24GB
48 GBQ4_K_M33.6Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M30.2Fits
NVIDIA4× RTX 3060 12GB
48 GBQ4_K_M29.6Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M21.7Too big
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M20.8Too big
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M16.6Too big
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M15.3Too big
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M10.8Too big
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M7.8Too big
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M7.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M6.6Too big
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M6.2Too big
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M3.8Too big
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M2.4Too big
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA V100 32GB (32.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
31.2 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
39.2 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
44.8 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
48.8 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
57.6 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
65.6 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
85.6 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
164.0 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen3-Coder-Next on your machine.

Run

ollama run qwen3-coder-next

Opciones de mejora

Hardware que ejecuta bien Qwen3-Coder-Next

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA V100 32GB run Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Yes, NVIDIA V100 32GB can run Qwen3-Coder-Next at Q2_K quantization (Very compromised (needs ~4.3 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 54.7 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q2_K it needs only 37.1 GB. Expected decode speed: 36.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Qwen3-Coder-Next need?

Qwen3-Coder-Next (80B parameters) requires approximately 54.7 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On NVIDIA V100 32GB, it fits at Q2_K using 37.1 GB.

What is the best quantization for Qwen3-Coder-Next?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on NVIDIA V100 32GB the best fitting quantization is Q2_K, which uses 37.1 GB.

What speed will Qwen3-Coder-Next run at on NVIDIA V100 32GB?

On NVIDIA V100 32GB, Qwen3-Coder-Next achieves approximately 36.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 5343ms using Q2_K quantization.

Can NVIDIA V100 32GB run Qwen3-Coder-Next for coding?

For coding workloads, Qwen3-Coder-Next on NVIDIA V100 32GB receives a F grade with 14.4 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Qwen3-Coder-Next use on NVIDIA V100 32GB?

On NVIDIA V100 32GB, Qwen3-Coder-Next can safely use up to 4K tokens of context at Q2_K quantization. The model's official context limit is 256K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Qwen3-Coder-Next feels slow on NVIDIA V100 32GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for NVIDIA V100 32GBSee all hardware for Qwen3-Coder-Next
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-3-coder-next-on-v100-32gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: