Will It Run AI

Can Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B run on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

B67Good
Estimated from fit model

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B needs ~27.0 GB VRAM. RTX 3090 Ti 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~23 tok/s.

Runtime: OllamaCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: HighStack: BasicBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 27.0 GB, 23.1 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~2.2 GB host RAM)
27.0 GB required24.0 GB available
113% VRAM needed

3.0 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~2.2 GB host RAM)

Decode

23.1 tok/s

TTFT

8370 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

27.0 GB / 24.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights19.5 GB
KV Cache3.9 GB
Runtime1.2 GB
Headroom2.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsQwen 2.5 Coder 32B on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 23.1 tok/s decode · 8.4s TTFT (warm) · 58 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 2.2 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatARuns with offload (needs ~0.8 GB host RAM)27.1 tok/s3899 ms4K
CodingBVery compromised (needs ~2.2 GB host RAM)23.1 tok/s8370 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy17.4 tok/s16177 ms4K
ReasoningBVery compromised (needs ~2.2 GB host RAM)23.1 tok/s9892 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy17.4 tok/s20221 ms4K

Quantization options

How Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (32B params) fits at each quantization level on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB (24.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
12.5 GB
LowA78
Q3_K_S
3
15.7 GB
LowA77
NVFP4Best for your GPU
4
17.9 GB
MediumA77
Q4_K_M
4
19.5 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
23.0 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
26.2 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
34.2 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
65.6 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on your machine.

Run

ollama run qwen2.5-coder

Opciones de mejora

Hardware que ejecuta bien Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Frequently asked questions

Can RTX 3090 Ti 24GB run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?

Yes, RTX 3090 Ti 24GB can run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B with a B grade (Very compromised (needs ~2.2 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 23.1 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B need?

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (32B parameters) requires approximately 27.0 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B?

The recommended quantization for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B run at on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

On RTX 3090 Ti 24GB, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B achieves approximately 23.1 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 8370ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can RTX 3090 Ti 24GB run Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B for coding?

For coding workloads, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB receives a B grade with 23.1 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B use on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

On RTX 3090 Ti 24GB, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B feels slow on RTX 3090 Ti 24GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for RTX 3090 Ti 24GBSee all hardware for Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-on-rtx-3090-ti-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: