Will It Run AI

Can embeddinggemma 300M run on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

YES — Runs Great

D35Poor
Estimated from fit model

embeddinggemma 300M needs ~11.1 GB VRAM. NVIDIA GH200 96GB has 96.0 GB. With Q6_K quantization, expect ~4 tok/s.

Runtime: OllamaCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: HighStack: BasicBottleneck: Memory bandwidth
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q6_K (High quality) 11.1 GB, 4.2 tok/s, Runs well
11.1 GB required96.0 GB available
12% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

4.2 tok/s

TTFT

46095 ms

Safe context

13.6M

Memory

11.1 GB / 96.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights0.2 GB
KV Cache0.1 GB
Runtime1.2 GB
Headroom9.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsembeddinggemma 300M on NVIDIA GH200 96GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API. When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed. Key benefits of running locally: - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine - No per-token cost or rate limits - Works offline once the model is downloaded - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb: Model size Q4 (4-bit) Q8 (8-bit) FP16 7B params ~4.3 GB ~7.5 GB ~14 GB 13B params ~7.9 GB ~13.9 GB ~26 GB 70B params ~42.7 GB ~74.9 GB ~140 GB Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 4.2 tok/s decode · 46.1s TTFT (warm) · 11 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This model fits, but memory bandwidth is the part holding decode speed back.

Throughput will feel slow

Estimated decode speed is only 4.2 tok/s, so this is more of a technical fit than a comfortable daily-driver setup.

Best improvement path

Prioritize bandwidth, not only capacity

If this workload feels slow, the next useful step is often a GPU tier with materially faster memory bandwidth rather than only a small bump in capacity.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatDRuns well4.2 tok/s25143 ms6.8M
CodingDRuns well4.2 tok/s46095 ms13.6M
Agentic CodingDRuns well4.2 tok/s67048 ms27.2M
ReasoningDRuns well4.2 tok/s54476 ms13.6M
RAGDRuns well4.2 tok/s83810 ms27.2M

Quantization options

How embeddinggemma 300M (0.30000001192092896B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA GH200 96GB (96.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
0.1 GB
LowD39
Q3_K_S
3
0.1 GB
LowD39
NVFP4
4
0.2 GB
MediumD39
Q4_K_M
4
0.2 GB
MediumD39
Q5_K_M
5
0.2 GB
HighD39
Q6_K
6
0.2 GB
HighD39
Q8_0
8
0.3 GB
Very HighD39
F16Best for your GPU
16
0.6 GB
MaximumD39

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run embeddinggemma 300M on your machine.

Run

docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \ --hf-repo "ggml-org/embeddinggemma-300M-GGUF" \ --hf-file "embeddinggemma-300M-GGUF-Q6_K.gguf" \ -c 4096 -ngl 99

Opciones de mejora

Hardware que ejecuta bien embeddinggemma 300M

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run embeddinggemma 300M?

Yes, NVIDIA GH200 96GB can run embeddinggemma 300M with a D grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 4.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does embeddinggemma 300M need?

embeddinggemma 300M (0.30000001192092896B parameters) requires approximately 11.1 GB of memory with Q6_K quantization.

What is the best quantization for embeddinggemma 300M?

The recommended quantization for embeddinggemma 300M is Q6_K, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will embeddinggemma 300M run at on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, embeddinggemma 300M achieves approximately 4.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 46095ms using Q6_K quantization.

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run embeddinggemma 300M for coding?

For coding workloads, embeddinggemma 300M on NVIDIA GH200 96GB receives a D grade with 4.2 tok/s and 13.6M context.

What context window can embeddinggemma 300M use on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, embeddinggemma 300M can safely use up to 13.6M tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if embeddinggemma 300M feels slow on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

Prioritize bandwidth, not only capacity. If this workload feels slow, the next useful step is often a GPU tier with materially faster memory bandwidth rather than only a small bump in capacity.

See all results for NVIDIA GH200 96GBSee all hardware for embeddinggemma 300M
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-ggml-org--embeddinggemma-300m-gguf-on-gh200-96gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: