Can Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B run on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

YES — With Q2_K

A79Great
Estimated from fit model

Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B needs ~10.7 GB VRAM. Intel Arc B570 10GB has 10.0 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~22 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B at Q4_K_M needs 13.9 GB — too much for Intel Arc B570 10GB (10.0 GB). Runs at Q2_K (10.7 GB) with low quality.
Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 13.9 GB, exceeds 10.0 GB available
13.9 GB required10.0 GB available
139% VRAM needed

3.9 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

9.6 tok/s

TTFT

20203 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

13.9 GB / 10.0 GB

Offload

30%

Memory breakdown

Weights9.0 GB
KV Cache3.1 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.0 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsPhi-4-reasoning-plus 14B on Intel Arc B570 10GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step. Given information: - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour) - Time = 2.5 hours Formula: Distance = Speed x Time Calculation: Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h = 150 miles The train travels 150 miles. Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time. Breakdown: - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance) - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles Total distance: 150 miles (same) Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 9.6 tok/s decode · 20.2s TTFT (warm) · 24 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy12.1 tok/s8696 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy9.6 tok/s20203 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy6.4 tok/s44033 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy9.6 tok/s23876 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy6.4 tok/s55041 ms4K

Inference speed

Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~144 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M143.9Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M91.8Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M82.9Fits
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M78.5Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M75.5Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M66.8Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M55.6Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M52.7Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M37.6Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M37.6Fits
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M28.8Fits
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M26.4Fits
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M24.9Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M23.0Fits
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M14.6Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M5.5Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B (14.699999809265137B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B570 10GB (10.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_KBest for your GPU
2
5.7 GB
LowS92
Q3_K_S
3
7.2 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
8.2 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
9.0 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
10.6 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
12.1 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
15.7 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
30.1 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B on your machine.

Run

ollama run phi4-reasoning

Upgrade-Optionen

Hardware, die Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B gut ausführt

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B?

Yes, Intel Arc B570 10GB can run Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B at Q2_K quantization (Runs with offload (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 13.9 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q2_K it needs only 10.7 GB. Expected decode speed: 21.8 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B need?

Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B (14.699999809265137B parameters) requires approximately 13.9 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On Intel Arc B570 10GB, it fits at Q2_K using 10.7 GB.

What is the best quantization for Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on Intel Arc B570 10GB the best fitting quantization is Q2_K, which uses 10.7 GB.

What speed will Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B run at on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B achieves approximately 21.8 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 8861ms using Q2_K quantization.

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B for coding?

For coding workloads, Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B on Intel Arc B570 10GB receives a F grade with 9.6 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B use on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B can safely use up to 12K tokens of context at Q2_K quantization. The model's official context limit is 33K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B feels slow on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc B570 10GB for Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc B570 10GBSee all hardware for Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/phi-4-reasoning-plus-14b-on-arc-b570-10gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: