Can Mistral Small 4 119B run on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB?

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run
Estimated from fit model

Mistral Small 4 119B needs ~85.8 GB but Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB only has 46.1 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 85.8 GB, exceeds 46.1 GB available
85.8 GB required46.1 GB available
186% VRAM needed

39.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

13.7 tok/s

TTFT

14154 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

85.8 GB / 46.1 GB

Offload

50%

Memory breakdown

Weights72.6 GB
KV Cache5.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom6.9 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsMistral Small 4 119B on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 13.7 tok/s decode · 14.2s TTFT (warm) · 34 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable shared or unified memory is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 85.8 GB, but this setup only exposes 46.1 GB of usable shared or unified memory.

Best improvement path

Move to a larger memory pool

A larger unified-memory SKU or a discrete high-bandwidth GPU is the cleanest way to make this model practical.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy14.2 tok/s7457 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy13.7 tok/s14154 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy13.4 tok/s21050 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy13.7 tok/s16727 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy13.4 tok/s26313 ms4K

Quantization options

How Mistral Small 4 119B (119B params) fits at each quantization level on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB (46.1 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
46.4 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
58.3 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
66.6 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
72.6 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
85.7 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
97.6 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
127.3 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
244.0 GB
MaximumF0

Upgrade-Optionen

Hardware, die Mistral Small 4 119B gut ausführt

Frequently asked questions

Can Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB run Mistral Small 4 119B?

No, Mistral Small 4 119B requires more memory than Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB provides.

How much VRAM does Mistral Small 4 119B need?

Mistral Small 4 119B (119B parameters) requires approximately 85.8 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Mistral Small 4 119B?

The recommended quantization for Mistral Small 4 119B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Mistral Small 4 119B run at on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB?

On Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB, Mistral Small 4 119B achieves approximately 13.7 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 14154ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB run Mistral Small 4 119B for coding?

For coding workloads, Mistral Small 4 119B on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB receives a F grade with 13.7 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Mistral Small 4 119B use on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB?

On Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB, Mistral Small 4 119B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 256K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Mistral Small 4 119B feels slow on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB?

Move to a larger memory pool. A larger unified-memory SKU or a discrete high-bandwidth GPU is the cleanest way to make this model practical.

Is unified memory on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB as fast as VRAM for Mistral Small 4 119B?

Not always. Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.

See all results for Mac Studio M1 Ultra 64GBSee all hardware for Mistral Small 4 119B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/mistral-small-4-119b-on-m1-ultra-64gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: