Can EXAONE 4.0 32B run on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

D36Poor
Estimated from fit model

EXAONE 4.0 32B needs ~26.6 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~8 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 26.6 GB, 7.8 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)
26.6 GB required24.0 GB available
111% VRAM needed

2.6 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)

Decode

7.8 tok/s

TTFT

24698 ms

Safe context

5K

Memory

26.6 GB / 24.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights19.5 GB
KV Cache3.8 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom2.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsEXAONE 4.0 32B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API. When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed. Key benefits of running locally: - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine - No per-token cost or rate limits - Works offline once the model is downloaded - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb: Model size Q4 (4-bit) Q8 (8-bit) FP16 7B params ~4.3 GB ~7.5 GB ~14 GB 13B params ~7.9 GB ~13.9 GB ~26 GB 70B params ~42.7 GB ~74.9 GB ~140 GB Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 7.8 tok/s decode · 24.7s TTFT (warm) · 20 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatCRuns with offload (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)9.1 tok/s11603 ms5K
CodingDVery compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)7.8 tok/s24698 ms5K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy6.0 tok/s47028 ms5K
ReasoningDVery compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)7.8 tok/s29188 ms5K
RAGFToo heavy6.0 tok/s58785 ms5K

Quantization options

How EXAONE 4.0 32B (32B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
12.5 GB
LowC50
Q3_K_S
3
15.7 GB
LowC49
NVFP4Best for your GPU
4
17.9 GB
MediumC49
Q4_K_M
4
19.5 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
23.0 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
26.2 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
34.2 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
65.6 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run EXAONE 4.0 32B on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-lgai-exaone--exaone-4-0-32b-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade-Optionen

Hardware, die EXAONE 4.0 32B gut ausführt

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run EXAONE 4.0 32B?

Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run EXAONE 4.0 32B with a D grade (Very compromised (needs ~1.9 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 7.8 tok/s.

How much VRAM does EXAONE 4.0 32B need?

EXAONE 4.0 32B (32B parameters) requires approximately 26.6 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for EXAONE 4.0 32B?

The recommended quantization for EXAONE 4.0 32B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will EXAONE 4.0 32B run at on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, EXAONE 4.0 32B achieves approximately 7.8 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 24698ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB run EXAONE 4.0 32B for coding?

For coding workloads, EXAONE 4.0 32B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a D grade with 7.8 tok/s and 5K context.

What context window can EXAONE 4.0 32B use on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, EXAONE 4.0 32B can safely use up to 5K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if EXAONE 4.0 32B feels slow on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB for EXAONE 4.0 32B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc Pro B60 24GBSee all hardware for EXAONE 4.0 32B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-lgai-exaone--exaone-4-0-32b-gguf-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: