Can Gemma 4 31B run on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB?

BARELY — Tight on Memory

A75Great
Estimated from fit model

Gemma 4 31B needs ~37.5 GB VRAM. RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB has 32.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~16 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 37.5 GB, 16.2 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~2.7 GB host RAM)
37.5 GB required32.0 GB available
117% VRAM needed

5.5 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~2.7 GB host RAM)

Decode

16.2 tok/s

TTFT

11963 ms

Safe context

10K

Memory

37.5 GB / 32.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights18.7 GB
KV Cache14.6 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom3.2 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsGemma 4 31B on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 16.2 tok/s decode · 12.0s TTFT (warm) · 41 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 2.7 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatSTight fit29.2 tok/s3615 ms10K
CodingAVery compromised (needs ~2.7 GB host RAM)16.2 tok/s11963 ms10K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy8.3 tok/s34109 ms10K
ReasoningAVery compromised (needs ~2.7 GB host RAM)16.2 tok/s14138 ms10K
RAGFToo heavy8.3 tok/s42636 ms10K

Inference speed

Gemma 4 31B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Gemma 4 31B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB at ~26 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M25.5Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M25.5Tight
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M23.7Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M19.7Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M18.7Fits
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M15.0Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M13.0Too big
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M13.0Heavy offload
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M11.1Too big
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M10.2Tight
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M9.3Tight
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M7.8Too big
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M5.1Too big
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M3.2Too big
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M2.0Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Gemma 4 31B (30.700000762939453B params) fits at each quantization level on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB (32.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
12.0 GB
LowA84
Q3_K_S
3
15.0 GB
LowS86
NVFP4
4
17.2 GB
MediumS86
Q4_K_M
4
18.7 GB
MediumS86
Q5_K_M
5
22.1 GB
HighS86
Q6_KBest for your GPU
6
25.2 GB
HighS85
Q8_0
8
32.8 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
62.9 GB
MaximumF0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Gemma 4 31B on your machine.

Run

ollama run gemma4:31b

Your hardware

More models your RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB can run

ModelParamsGradeDecodeCapabilities
AlibabaQwen 3.6 35B A3B35BS95.6 tok/s
AlibabaQwen 3.5 35B A3B35BS104 tok/s
AlibabaQwen 3 32B32BS41.9 tok/s

Frequently asked questions

Can RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB run Gemma 4 31B?

Yes, RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB can run Gemma 4 31B with a A grade (Very compromised (needs ~2.7 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 16.2 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Gemma 4 31B need?

Gemma 4 31B (30.700000762939453B parameters) requires approximately 37.5 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Gemma 4 31B?

The recommended quantization for Gemma 4 31B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Gemma 4 31B run at on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB?

On RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB, Gemma 4 31B achieves approximately 16.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 11963ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB run Gemma 4 31B for coding?

For coding workloads, Gemma 4 31B on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB receives a A grade with 16.2 tok/s and 10K context.

What context window can Gemma 4 31B use on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB?

On RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB, Gemma 4 31B can safely use up to 10K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 256K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Gemma 4 31B feels slow on RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

See all results for RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32GBSee all hardware for Gemma 4 31B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/gemma-4-31b-on-rtx-pro-4500-blackwell-32gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: