Can Codestral 22B run on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run
Estimated from fit model

Codestral 22B needs ~17.8 GB but Intel Arc B570 10GB only has 10.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity
Share:

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) 17.8 GB, exceeds 10.0 GB available
17.8 GB required10.0 GB available
178% VRAM needed

7.8 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.9 tok/s

TTFT

49718 ms

Safe context

4K

Memory

17.8 GB / 10.0 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights13.4 GB
KV Cache2.4 GB
Runtime0.9 GB
Headroom1.0 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower
See how fast it feelsCodestral 22B on Intel Arc B570 10GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort: def quicksort(arr): if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) # Example usage numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1] print(quicksort(numbers)) # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10] The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]: """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm. Args: arr: List of integers to sort. Returns: A new sorted list. """ if len(arr) <= 1: return arr pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2] left = [x for x in arr if x < pivot] middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot] right = [x for x in arr if x > pivot] return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right) Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 3.9 tok/s decode · 49.7s TTFT (warm) · 10 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 17.8 GB, but this setup only exposes 10.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

WorkloadGradeFitDecodeTTFTContext
ChatFToo heavy4.5 tok/s23452 ms4K
CodingFToo heavy3.9 tok/s49718 ms4K
Agentic CodingFToo heavy3.0 tok/s94047 ms4K
ReasoningFToo heavy3.9 tok/s58757 ms4K
RAGFToo heavy3.0 tok/s117559 ms4K

Inference speed

Codestral 22B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Codestral 22B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~96 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / MacMemoryQuantSpeed (tok/s)Fits?
NVIDIARTX 5090 32GB
32 GBQ4_K_M96.2Fits
NVIDIARTX 4090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M61.4Fits
RX 7900 XTX 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M55.4Fits
NVIDIARTX 3090 24GB
24 GBQ4_K_M52.5Fits
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB
256 GBQ4_K_M44.6Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M37.4Fits
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M37.4Fits
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M37.2Fits
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
128 GBQ4_K_M35.2Fits
NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 16GB
16 GBQ4_K_M26.5Heavy offload
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB
48 GBQ4_K_M23.6Fits
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M19.2Fits
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB
64 GBQ4_K_M17.6Fits
NVIDIARTX 4070 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M9.4Too big
NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB
12 GBQ4_K_M5.9Too big
NVIDIARTX 4060 8GB
8 GBQ4_K_M2.4Too big

Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.

Quantization options

How Codestral 22B (22B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B570 10GB (10.0 GB usable).

QuantBitsVRAMQualityFit
Q2_K
2
8.6 GB
LowF0
Q3_K_S
3
10.8 GB
LowF0
NVFP4
4
12.3 GB
MediumF0
Q4_K_M
4
13.4 GB
MediumF0
Q5_K_M
5
15.8 GB
HighF0
Q6_K
6
18.0 GB
HighF0
Q8_0
8
23.5 GB
Very HighF0
F16
16
45.1 GB
MaximumF0

Upgrade-Optionen

Hardware, die Codestral 22B gut ausführt

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run Codestral 22B?

No, Codestral 22B requires more memory than Intel Arc B570 10GB provides.

How much VRAM does Codestral 22B need?

Codestral 22B (22B parameters) requires approximately 17.8 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Codestral 22B?

The recommended quantization for Codestral 22B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Codestral 22B run at on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, Codestral 22B achieves approximately 3.9 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 49718ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run Codestral 22B for coding?

For coding workloads, Codestral 22B on Intel Arc B570 10GB receives a F grade with 3.9 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Codestral 22B use on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, Codestral 22B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 33K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Codestral 22B feels slow on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc B570 10GB for Codestral 22B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

See all results for Intel Arc B570 10GBSee all hardware for Codestral 22B
Embed this result

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/codestral-22b-on-arc-b570-10gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: