Qwen 3.5 27B VRAM Requirements — Dense Model Hardware Guide (Q4/Q5/Q6/Q8)
Qwen 3.5 27B needs ~16.5 GB at Q4_K_M on RTX 4090. See also the newer Qwen3.6-27B (April 22, 2026) which needs 16.8 GB Q4 and beats it on coding benchmarks.
If you are searching for Qwen 3.5 27B VRAM requirements, "will it run on my RTX 4090", or GGUF hardware guidance, this page has the exact numbers and realistic fit advice.
New in April 2026: Qwen3.6-27B released April 22 with nearly identical VRAM (16.8 GB Q4) but SWE-bench Verified 77.2% vs Qwen 3.5 27B's ~62%. If you already run Qwen 3.5 27B, upgrading to 3.6 is a free quality win on the same hardware.
Quick answers
- Q4_K_M: ~16.5 GB — fits comfortably on 24 GB cards (RTX 4090, 3090)
- Q5_K_M: ~19.4 GB — still fits on 24 GB, tighter context
- Q6_K: ~22.1 GB — tight on 24 GB, comfortable on 32 GB+
- Q8_0: ~28.9 GB — needs 32 GB+ (RTX 5090) or Apple Silicon 64 GB+
- FP16: ~55.4 GB — datacenter GPU (A100/H100 80GB) or Mac Max 64 GB+
- Speed expectation: 30-40 tok/s on RTX 4090 at Q4, 50-65 tok/s on RTX 5090
Qwen 3.5 27B specifications
Qwen 3.5 27B is the dense flagship in the size class that fits a single consumer 24 GB GPU. Unlike the 35B-A3B MoE sibling, every forward pass activates the full 27B parameter set — that means slightly slower inference but more consistent quality on complex reasoning, multi-step problems, and coding tasks.
| Spec | Value |
|---|---|
| Total parameters | 27 billion |
| Architecture | Dense transformer |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (native, extensible to ~1M) |
| Provider | Alibaba Cloud |
| License | Open weights (Apache 2.0) |
| Release date | February 2026 |
| Top GGUF providers | Unsloth, LM Studio Community, bartowski |
| MLX provider | mlx-community |
VRAM by quantization
Weights-only numbers calibrated against published GGUF files. Add 1-2 GB for KV cache at 4K-8K context, or scale up for longer contexts.
| Quantization | VRAM (weights) | 24 GB GPU | 32 GB GPU | Apple Silicon 36 GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4_K_M | 16.5 GB | ✅ ~7 GB headroom | ✅ comfortable | ✅ comfortable |
| Q5_K_M | 19.4 GB | ✅ ~4 GB headroom | ✅ comfortable | ✅ comfortable |
| Q6_K | 22.1 GB | ⚠️ tight (1.9 GB headroom) | ✅ ~10 GB | ✅ ~13 GB |
| Q8_0 | 28.9 GB | ❌ overflows | ✅ tight | ✅ ~6 GB |
| FP16 | 55.4 GB | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ (needs 64 GB+) |
Context window impact
Qwen 3.5 27B supports native 262K context. KV cache at that scale is significant. Rules of thumb:
- 4K context: +1 GB KV cache
- 16K context: +3 GB KV cache
- 32K context: +6 GB KV cache
- 64K context: +12 GB KV cache
- 128K+ context: partial offloading needed on a 24 GB card
For most interactive use (chat, coding assistance), 8K-16K context is plenty — keeping the total VRAM budget comfortably under 22 GB.
Hardware compatibility matrix
16 GB GPUs — tight, not recommended
| GPU | Q4 fit | Workaround |
|---|---|---|
| RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | ⚠️ marginal | Needs partial CPU offload for context >2K |
| RTX 5080 16GB | ⚠️ marginal | Short contexts only, slow otherwise |
Prefer 9B for this tier if you want comfortable fit.
24 GB GPUs — sweet spot
| GPU | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Speed at Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~35-45 tok/s |
| RTX 3090 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~25-35 tok/s |
| RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~30-40 tok/s |
| RX 7900 XTX 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~25-35 tok/s |
| L4 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~20-28 tok/s |
| A10 24GB | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ~22-32 tok/s |
32 GB GPUs — any quantization
| GPU | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q8 | Speed at Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 5090 32GB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ tight | ~55-65 tok/s |
| R9700 32GB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ tight | ~40-55 tok/s |
48 GB+ GPUs
Any professional 48 GB GPU (A6000, RTX 6000 Ada, L40) runs every quantization comfortably. For FP16 full precision you need 80 GB (A100, H100) or go Apple Silicon 64 GB+.
Apple Silicon guide
| Mac | RAM | Q4 fit | Q6 fit | FP16 fit | Speed at Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M4 16GB | 16 GB | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | N/A |
| M4 Pro 24GB | 24 GB | ⚠️ tight | ❌ | ❌ | ~10-15 tok/s |
| M4 Max 36GB | 36 GB | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ~18-24 tok/s |
| M4 Max 64GB | 64 GB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ~20-28 tok/s |
| M4 Max 128GB | 128 GB | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ~22-30 tok/s |
For Mac users, MLX delivers 15-25% better throughput than GGUF at the same quantization on Apple Silicon. Pick mlx-community/Qwen3.5-27B-MLX-4bit via LM Studio or mlx-lm.
Setup commands
Ollama
ollama run qwen3.5:27b
llama.cpp with Unsloth Q4_K_M
git clone https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp && cd llama.cpp && make -j
huggingface-cli download unsloth/Qwen3.5-27B-GGUF \
Qwen3.5-27B-Q4_K_M.gguf --local-dir models/
./llama-cli -m models/Qwen3.5-27B-Q4_K_M.gguf \
-n 512 --color -cnv -p "You are a careful reasoning assistant."
MLX on Mac
pip install mlx-lm
mlx_lm.generate --model mlx-community/Qwen3.5-27B-MLX-4bit \
--prompt "Explain gradient descent in one paragraph."
vLLM (production serving)
vllm serve unsloth/Qwen3.5-27B-GGUF \
--quantization gguf \
--max-model-len 32768 \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.92
How Qwen 3.5 27B compares
vs Qwen 3 32B (previous generation)
| Metric | Qwen 3.5 27B | Qwen 3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 27B | 32B |
| VRAM at Q4 | 16.5 GB | 19.1 GB |
| Context | 262K native | 131K native |
| Quality (MMLU) | matches or beats | baseline |
Qwen 3.5 27B is the clear upgrade — lower VRAM, longer context, better quality.
vs Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B (MoE sibling)
See the Qwen 3.5 35B-A3B guide for the MoE counterpart. Short version: 35B-A3B is faster (~70 tok/s vs 35 tok/s on RTX 4090) but uses ~5 GB more VRAM. 27B dense is often stronger on complex reasoning and coding.
vs Gemma 3 27B
| Metric | Qwen 3.5 27B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM at Q4 | 16.5 GB | 15.1 GB |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Multilingual | ✅✅ (100+ languages) | ✅ |
| Coding | ✅✅ | ✅ |
Qwen 3.5 27B wins on context length and coding; Gemma 3 27B is slightly lighter on VRAM.
Check compatibility
- Qwen 3.5 27B model page — full spec + all hardware verdicts
- Qwen 3.5 27B on RTX 4090
- Qwen 3.5 27B on RTX 5090
- Qwen 3.5 27B on M4 Max 36GB