Can StarCoder2 3B run on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB?

Q: Is unified memory on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB as fast as VRAM for StarCoder2 3B?

Not always. Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.

YES — Runs Great

C42Usable

Estimated from fit model

StarCoder2 3B needs ~13.6 GB VRAM. Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB has 69.1 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~42 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.6 GB, 42.0 tok/s, Runs well

13.6 GB required69.1 GB available

20% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

42.0 tok/s

TTFT

4610 ms

Safe context

16K

Memory

13.6 GB / 69.1 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights1.8 GB

KV Cache0.5 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom10.4 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsStarCoder2 3B on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 42.0 tok/s decode · 4.6s TTFT (warm) · 105 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Runs well	42.0 tok/s	2514 ms	16K
Coding	C	Runs well	42.0 tok/s	4610 ms	16K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs well	42.0 tok/s	6705 ms	16K
Reasoning	C	Runs well	42.0 tok/s	5448 ms	16K
RAG	C	Runs well	42.0 tok/s	8381 ms	16K

Inference speed

StarCoder2 3B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for StarCoder2 3B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~57 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / Mac	Memory	Quant	Speed (tok/s)	Fits?
RTX 5090 32GB	32 GB	Q4_K_M	57.0	Fits
RTX 4090 24GB	24 GB	Q4_K_M	48.0	Fits
RTX 4080 Super 16GB	16 GB	Q4_K_M	48.0

Quantization options

How StarCoder2 3B (3B params) fits at each quantization level on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB (69.1 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	1.2 GB	Low	D39
Q3_K_S	3	1.5 GB	Low	D39
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run StarCoder2 3B on your machine.

Run

ollama run starcoder2:3b

Frequently asked questions

Can Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB run StarCoder2 3B?

Yes, Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB can run StarCoder2 3B with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 42.0 tok/s.

How much VRAM does StarCoder2 3B need?

StarCoder2 3B (3B parameters) requires approximately 13.6 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for StarCoder2 3B?

The recommended quantization for StarCoder2 3B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will StarCoder2 3B run at on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB?

On Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB, StarCoder2 3B achieves approximately 42.0 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 4610ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB run StarCoder2 3B for coding?

For coding workloads, StarCoder2 3B on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB receives a C grade with 42.0 tok/s and 16K context.

What context window can StarCoder2 3B use on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB?

On Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB, StarCoder2 3B can safely use up to 16K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 16K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

Is unified memory on Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB as fast as VRAM for StarCoder2 3B?

See all results for Mac Studio M3 Ultra 96GB See all hardware for StarCoder2 3B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/starcoder2-3b-on-m3-ultra-96gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: