Can StarCoder 7B run on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if StarCoder 7B feels slow on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

Estimated from fit model

StarCoder 7B needs ~13.3 GB but Radeon PRO W7600 8GB only has 8.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.3 GB, exceeds 8.0 GB available

13.3 GB required8.0 GB available

166% VRAM needed

5.3 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

10.2 tok/s

TTFT

18894 ms

Safe context

Memory

13.3 GB / 8.0 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights4.3 GB

KV Cache7.3 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom0.8 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsStarCoder 7B on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 10.2 tok/s decode · 18.9s TTFT (warm) · 26 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 13.3 GB, but this setup only exposes 8.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	20.2 tok/s	5230 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	10.2 tok/s	18894 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	6.0 tok/s	47176 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	10.2 tok/s	22330 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	6.0 tok/s	58970 ms	4K

Quantization options

How StarCoder 7B (7B params) fits at each quantization level on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB (8.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	2.7 GB	Low	A77
Q3_K_S	3	3.4 GB	Low	A77
NVFP4	4

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs StarCoder 7B well

RX 7600 XT 16GBBudget pick

16 GB VRAM (+8)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.39.1 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$329 MSRP

RX 9060 XT 16GBBest value

16 GB VRAM (+8)320 GB/s (+32)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.47.2 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$349 MSRP

RX 7700 XT 12GBAMD upgrade

12 GB VRAM (+4)432 GB/s (+144)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.34.5 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 238%.

~$449 MSRP

RX 7900 XT 20GBBiggest leap

20 GB VRAM (+12)800 GB/s (+512)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.98 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$899 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Radeon PRO W7600 8GB run StarCoder 7B?

No, StarCoder 7B requires more memory than Radeon PRO W7600 8GB provides.

How much VRAM does StarCoder 7B need?

StarCoder 7B (7B parameters) requires approximately 13.3 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for StarCoder 7B?

The recommended quantization for StarCoder 7B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will StarCoder 7B run at on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB?

On Radeon PRO W7600 8GB, StarCoder 7B achieves approximately 10.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 18894ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Radeon PRO W7600 8GB run StarCoder 7B for coding?

For coding workloads, StarCoder 7B on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB receives a F grade with 10.2 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can StarCoder 7B use on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB?

On Radeon PRO W7600 8GB, StarCoder 7B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if StarCoder 7B feels slow on Radeon PRO W7600 8GB?

See all results for Radeon PRO W7600 8GB See all hardware for StarCoder 7B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/starcoder-7b-on-radeon-pro-w7600-8gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: