Can StarCoder 7B run on GTX 1650 4GB?

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

Estimated from fit model

StarCoder 7B needs ~13.2 GB but GTX 1650 4GB only has 4.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: OllamaCapacity: No fitBandwidth: Very lowStack: BasicBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.2 GB, exceeds 4.0 GB available

13.2 GB required4.0 GB available

330% VRAM needed

9.2 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

2.2 tok/s

TTFT

86112 ms

Safe context

Memory

13.2 GB / 4.0 GB

Offload

70%

Memory breakdown

Weights4.3 GB

KV Cache7.3 GB

Runtime1.2 GB

Headroom0.4 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsStarCoder 7B on GTX 1650 4GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 2.2 tok/s decode · 86.1s TTFT (warm) · 6 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 13.2 GB, but this setup only exposes 4.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Older PCIe generation

PCIe 3.0 is workable, but it compounds the penalty when you offload heavily or try to scale across multiple cards.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	2.2 tok/s	46970 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	2.2 tok/s	86112 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	2.2 tok/s	125253 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	2.2 tok/s	101768 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	2.2 tok/s	156567 ms	4K

Quantization options

How StarCoder 7B (7B params) fits at each quantization level on GTX 1650 4GB (4.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	2.7 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	3.4 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs StarCoder 7B well

RTX 3060 12GBBest value

12 GB VRAM (+8)360 GB/s (+232)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.30.2 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 1273%.

~$329 MSRP

RTX 5060 Ti 16GBBudget pick

16 GB VRAM (+12)448 GB/s (+320)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.65 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$449 MSRP

RTX 4060 Ti 16GBNVIDIA upgrade

16 GB VRAM (+12)288 GB/s (+160)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.49.2 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$499 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can GTX 1650 4GB run StarCoder 7B?

No, StarCoder 7B requires more memory than GTX 1650 4GB provides.

How much VRAM does StarCoder 7B need?

StarCoder 7B (7B parameters) requires approximately 13.2 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for StarCoder 7B?

The recommended quantization for StarCoder 7B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will StarCoder 7B run at on GTX 1650 4GB?

On GTX 1650 4GB, StarCoder 7B achieves approximately 2.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 86112ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can GTX 1650 4GB run StarCoder 7B for coding?

For coding workloads, StarCoder 7B on GTX 1650 4GB receives a F grade with 2.2 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can StarCoder 7B use on GTX 1650 4GB?

On GTX 1650 4GB, StarCoder 7B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if StarCoder 7B feels slow on GTX 1650 4GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

See all results for GTX 1650 4GB See all hardware for StarCoder 7B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/starcoder-7b-on-gtx-1650-4gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: