Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc B580 12GB for StarCoder 7B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can StarCoder 7B run on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if StarCoder 7B feels slow on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

BARELY — Tight on Memory

B64Good

Estimated from fit model

StarCoder 7B needs ~13.7 GB VRAM. Intel Arc B580 12GB has 12.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~30 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 13.7 GB, 29.9 tok/s, Very compromised (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)

13.7 GB required12.0 GB available

114% VRAM needed

1.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Very compromised (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)

Decode

29.9 tok/s

TTFT

6466 ms

Safe context

Memory

13.7 GB / 12.0 GB

Offload

10%

Memory breakdown

Weights4.3 GB

KV Cache7.3 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.2 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsStarCoder 7B on Intel Arc B580 12GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 29.9 tok/s decode · 6.5s TTFT (warm) · 75 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	A	Tight fit	51.3 tok/s	2060 ms	8K
Coding	B	Very compromised	29.9 tok/s	6466 ms	8K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	12.5 tok/s	22539 ms	8K
Reasoning	B	Very compromised (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)	29.9 tok/s	7642 ms	8K
RAG	F	Too heavy	12.5 tok/s	28174 ms	8K

Inference speed

StarCoder 7B inference speed — tokens per second by GPU & Mac

Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for StarCoder 7B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~98 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.

GPU / Mac	Memory	Quant	Speed (tok/s)	Fits?
RTX 5090 32GB	32 GB	Q4_K_M	98.0	Fits
RTX 4090 24GB	24 GB	Q4_K_M	98.0	Fits
RTX 4080 Super 16GB	16 GB	Q4_K_M	98.0

Quantization options

How StarCoder 7B (7B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B580 12GB (12.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	2.7 GB	Low	A72
Q3_K_S	3	3.4 GB	Low	A73
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run StarCoder 7B on your machine.

Run

lms load starcoder-7b && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs StarCoder 7B well

Intel Arc A770 16GBBudget pick

16 GB VRAM (+4)560 GB/s (+104)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.59 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 97%.

~$349 MSRP

Intel Arc Pro B50 16GBBest value

16 GB VRAM (+4)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.28.3 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$399 MSRP

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GBIntel upgrade

24 GB VRAM (+12)

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.57.7 tok/s decode

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 93%.

~$599 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc B580 12GB run StarCoder 7B?

Yes, Intel Arc B580 12GB can run StarCoder 7B with a B grade (Very compromised). Expected decode speed: 29.9 tok/s.

How much VRAM does StarCoder 7B need?

StarCoder 7B (7B parameters) requires approximately 13.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for StarCoder 7B?

The recommended quantization for StarCoder 7B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will StarCoder 7B run at on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

On Intel Arc B580 12GB, StarCoder 7B achieves approximately 29.9 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 6466ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc B580 12GB run StarCoder 7B for coding?

For coding workloads, StarCoder 7B on Intel Arc B580 12GB receives a B grade with 29.9 tok/s and 8K context.

What context window can StarCoder 7B use on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

On Intel Arc B580 12GB, StarCoder 7B can safely use up to 8K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if StarCoder 7B feels slow on Intel Arc B580 12GB?

See all results for Intel Arc B580 12GB See all hardware for StarCoder 7B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/starcoder-7b-on-arc-b580-12gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: