Qwen 3.6 27B needs ~20.7 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~12 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Tight fit
Decode
12.3 tok/s
TTFT
15772 ms
Safe context
69K
Memory
20.7 GB / 24.0 GB
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | S | Tight fit | 12.3 tok/s | 8603 ms | 69K |
| Coding | S | Tight fit | 12.3 tok/s | 15772 ms | 69K |
| Agentic Coding | S | Tight fit | 12.3 tok/s | 22941 ms | 69K |
| Reasoning | S | Tight fit | 12.3 tok/s | 18640 ms | 69K |
| RAG | S | Tight fit | 12.3 tok/s | 28677 ms | 69K |
Inference speed
Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for Qwen 3.6 27B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~79 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.
| GPU / Mac | Memory | Quant | Speed (tok/s) | Fits? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 GB | Q4_K_M | 79.0 | Fits | |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 50.4 | Tight | |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 43.1 | Tight | |
RX 7900 XTX 24GB | 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 29.8 | Tight |
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB | 256 GB | Q4_K_M | 27.8 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 27.4 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 27.4 | Fits |
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 23.1 | Fits |
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 21.9 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB | 48 GB | Q4_K_M | 17.3 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 12.0 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 11.0 | Fits |
| 16 GB | Q4_K_M | 9.1 | Too big | |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 3.2 | Too big | |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 2.2 | Too big | |
| 8 GB | Q4_K_M | 2.0 | Too big |
Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.
How Qwen 3.6 27B (27B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 10.5 GB | Low | S92 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 13.2 GB | Low | S93 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 15.1 GB | Medium | S92 |
Q4_K_MBest for your GPU | 4 | 16.5 GB | Medium | S92 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 19.4 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 22.1 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 28.9 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 55.4 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 3.6 27B on your machine.
Run
lms load Qwen3.6-27B && lms server startYour hardware
| Model | Params | Grade | Decode | Capabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.5B | S | 37.2 tok/s |
Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run Qwen 3.6 27B with a S grade (Tight fit). Expected decode speed: 12.3 tok/s.
Qwen 3.6 27B (27B parameters) requires approximately 20.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for Qwen 3.6 27B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Qwen 3.6 27B achieves approximately 12.3 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 15772ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, Qwen 3.6 27B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a S grade with 12.3 tok/s and 69K context.
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Qwen 3.6 27B can safely use up to 69K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 262K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-3.6-27b-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: