Qwen 2.5 VL 7B needs ~6.6 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB has 6.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~15 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
0.6 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization
Fit status
Very compromised (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM)
Decode
14.6 tok/s
TTFT
13292 ms
Safe context
4K
Memory
6.6 GB / 6.0 GB
Offload
10%
It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.
CPU or host-memory offload is active
About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.
Very little memory headroom
You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Remove offload with more accelerator memory
Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Buy headroom, not only minimum fit
A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | A | Runs with offload (needs ~0.1 GB host RAM) | 16.8 tok/s | 6301 ms | 4K |
| Coding | B | Very compromised (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM) | 14.6 tok/s | 13292 ms | 4K |
| Agentic Coding | F | Too heavy | 11.3 tok/s | 24958 ms | 4K |
| Reasoning | B | Very compromised (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM) | 14.6 tok/s | 15708 ms | 4K |
| RAG | F | Too heavy | 10.4 tok/s | 33872 ms |
How Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (7B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB (6.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 2.7 GB | Low | A84 |
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU | 3 | 3.4 GB | Low | A83 |
Copy-paste commands to run Qwen 2.5 VL 7B on your machine.
Run
lms load Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct && lms server startUpgrade options
Intel Arc A580 8GBBudget pickRemoves host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.
Raises estimated decode speed by about 337%.
~$179 MSRP
Intel Arc B570 10GBBest valueRemoves host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.
Raises estimated decode speed by about 258%.
~$219 MSRP
Intel Arc B580 12GBIntel upgradeRemoves host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.
Raises estimated decode speed by about 282%.
~$249 MSRP
Yes, Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB can run Qwen 2.5 VL 7B with a B grade (Very compromised (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 14.6 tok/s.
Qwen 2.5 VL 7B (7B parameters) requires approximately 6.6 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for Qwen 2.5 VL 7B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B achieves approximately 14.6 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 13292ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB receives a B grade with 14.6 tok/s and 4K context.
On Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB, Qwen 2.5 VL 7B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 33K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/qwen-2.5-vl-7b-on-arc-pro-a40-6gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview:
| 4K |
| 4 |
3.9 GB |
| Medium |
| F0 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 4.3 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 5.0 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 5.7 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 7.5 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 14.3 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.