Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$6,999 MSRP
OpenHermes 2.5 7B needs ~19.9 GB VRAM. Gaudi 3 128GB has 128.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~98 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
98.0 tok/s
TTFT
1976 ms
Safe context
8K
Memory
19.9 GB / 128.0 GB
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs well | 98.0 tok/s | 1078 ms | 8K |
| Coding | C | Runs well | 98.0 tok/s | 1976 ms | 8K |
| Agentic Coding | C | Runs well | 98.0 tok/s | 2873 ms | 8K |
| Reasoning | C | Runs well | 98.0 tok/s | 2335 ms | 8K |
| RAG | C | Runs well | 98.0 tok/s | 3592 ms | 8K |
Inference speed
Estimated decode speed (tokens/sec) for OpenHermes 2.5 7B at Q4_K_M across popular GPUs and Apple Silicon, using the fastest local runtime per device. Fastest is RTX 5090 32GB at ~98 tok/s. Speed is memory-bandwidth bound, so cards that fit the whole model in VRAM run far faster than ones that offload to system RAM.
| GPU / Mac | Memory | Quant | Speed (tok/s) | Fits? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits | |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits | |
| 16 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits | |
| 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits | |
RX 7900 XTX 24GB | 24 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits |
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256GB | 256 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits |
Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits |
Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 98.0 | Fits |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 95.2 | Fits | |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 128GB | 128 GB | Q4_K_M | 94.4 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 94.4 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M3 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 60.4 | Fits |
| 12 GB | Q4_K_M | 59.8 | Fits | |
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64GB | 64 GB | Q4_K_M | 55.4 | Fits |
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB | 48 GB | Q4_K_M | 48.7 | Fits |
| 8 GB | Q4_K_M | 46.0 | Offloads |
Estimates for single-stream decoding at Q4_K_M; real tokens/sec varies with prompt length, context, batch size, and runtime build. Prompt processing (prefill) is faster than the decode figures shown here.
How OpenHermes 2.5 7B (7B params) fits at each quantization level on Gaudi 3 128GB (128.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 2.7 GB | Low | D39 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 3.4 GB | Low | D39 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 3.9 GB | Medium | D39 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 4.3 GB | Medium | D39 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 5.0 GB | High | D39 |
Q6_K | 6 | 5.7 GB | High | D39 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 7.5 GB | Very High | D39 |
F16Best for your GPU | 16 | 14.3 GB | Maximum | D39 |
Copy-paste commands to run OpenHermes 2.5 7B on your machine.
Run
ollama run openhermesUpgrade options
Yes, Gaudi 3 128GB can run OpenHermes 2.5 7B with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 98.0 tok/s.
OpenHermes 2.5 7B (7B parameters) requires approximately 19.9 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for OpenHermes 2.5 7B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Gaudi 3 128GB, OpenHermes 2.5 7B achieves approximately 98.0 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 1976ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, OpenHermes 2.5 7B on Gaudi 3 128GB receives a C grade with 98.0 tok/s and 8K context.
On Gaudi 3 128GB, OpenHermes 2.5 7B can safely use up to 8K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/openhermes-2.5-7b-on-gaudi-3-128gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: