Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A770 16GB for Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can Nemotron Nano 9B v2 run on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Nemotron Nano 9B v2 feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — Runs Great

A83Great

Estimated from fit model

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 needs ~10.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~49 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 10.4 GB, 49.3 tok/s, Runs well

10.4 GB required16.0 GB available

65% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

49.3 tok/s

TTFT

3923 ms

Safe context

52K

Memory

10.4 GB / 16.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights5.5 GB

KV Cache2.4 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsNemotron Nano 9B v2 on Intel Arc A770 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 49.3 tok/s decode · 3.9s TTFT (warm) · 123 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	A	Runs well	49.3 tok/s	2140 ms	52K
Coding	A	Runs well	49.3 tok/s	3923 ms	52K
Agentic Coding	A	Runs well	49.3 tok/s	5707 ms	52K
Reasoning	A	Runs well	49.3 tok/s	4637 ms	52K
RAG	A	Runs well	49.3 tok/s	7134 ms	52K

Quantization options

How Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (9B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A770 16GB (16.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	3.5 GB	Low	A77
Q3_K_S	3	4.4 GB	Low	A78
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on your machine.

Run

ollama run nemotron-nano:9b-v2

Your hardware

More models your Intel Arc A770 16GB can run

Model	Params	Grade	Decode	Capabilities
Qwen 3 14B	14B	S	31.9 tok/s
Phi-4-reasoning-plus 14B	14.7B	S	30.2 tok/s

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Yes, Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 with a A grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 49.3 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Nemotron Nano 9B v2 need?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (9B parameters) requires approximately 10.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

The recommended quantization for Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Nemotron Nano 9B v2 run at on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 achieves approximately 49.3 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 3923ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Nemotron Nano 9B v2 for coding?

For coding workloads, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 on Intel Arc A770 16GB receives a A grade with 49.3 tok/s and 52K context.

What context window can Nemotron Nano 9B v2 use on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 can safely use up to 52K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Nemotron Nano 9B v2 feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

See all results for Intel Arc A770 16GB See all hardware for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/nemotron-nano-9b-v2-on-arc-a770-16gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: