Nemotron 70B needs ~61.5 GB VRAM. NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB has 108.8 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~4 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
4.2 tok/s
TTFT
46408 ms
Safe context
131K
Memory
61.5 GB / 108.8 GB
The model fits in shared memory, but shared-memory bandwidth is now the real limiter.
Fit does not mean dedicated-VRAM speed
Unified or shared memory can make a model technically fit, but sustained tokens per second may still trail a discrete high-bandwidth GPU with less total memory.
Shared-memory contention still exists
The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.
Prioritize bandwidth, not only capacity
If this workload feels slow, the next useful step is often a GPU tier with materially faster memory bandwidth rather than only a small bump in capacity.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | B | Runs well | 4.2 tok/s | 25313 ms | 131K |
| Coding | B | Runs well | 4.2 tok/s | 46408 ms | 131K |
| Agentic Coding | B | Runs well | 4.2 tok/s | 67502 ms | 131K |
| Reasoning | B | Runs well | 4.2 tok/s | 54845 ms | 131K |
| RAG | B | Runs well | 4.2 tok/s | 84378 ms | 131K |
How Nemotron 70B (70B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB (92.2 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 27.3 GB | Low | B64 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 34.3 GB | Low | B66 |
NVFP4 | 4 |
Copy-paste commands to run Nemotron 70B on your machine.
Run
ollama run nemotronUpgrade options
NVIDIA H200 141GBBudget pickRaises estimated decode speed by about 2345%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$30,000 MSRP
NVIDIA H200 PCIe 141GBBest valueRaises estimated decode speed by about 2345%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$30,000 MSRP
NVIDIA B200 180GBNVIDIA upgradeRaises estimated decode speed by about 3974%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$30,000 MSRP
Yes, NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB can run Nemotron 70B with a B grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 4.2 tok/s.
Nemotron 70B (70B parameters) requires approximately 61.5 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for Nemotron 70B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB, Nemotron 70B achieves approximately 4.2 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 46408ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, Nemotron 70B on NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB receives a B grade with 4.2 tok/s and 131K context.
On NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB, Nemotron 70B can safely use up to 131K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/nemotron-70b-on-dgx-spark-128gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview:
39.2 GB |
| Medium |
| B67 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 42.7 GB | Medium | B68 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 50.4 GB | High | B69 |
Q6_K | 6 | 57.4 GB | High | B69 |
Q8_0Best for your GPU | 8 | 74.9 GB | Very High | B69 |
F16 | 16 | 143.5 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Prioritize bandwidth, not only capacity. If this workload feels slow, the next useful step is often a GPU tier with materially faster memory bandwidth rather than only a small bump in capacity.
Not always. NVIDIA DGX Spark 128GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.