Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A770 16GB for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can Nemotron 3 Nano 30B run on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Nemotron 3 Nano 30B feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — With Q2_K

S88Excellent

Estimated from fit model

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B needs ~16.6 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16.0 GB. With Q2_K quantization, expect ~14 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B at Q4_K_M needs 23.2 GB — too much for Intel Arc A770 16GB (16.0 GB). Runs at Q2_K (16.6 GB) with low quality.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 23.2 GB, exceeds 16.0 GB available

23.2 GB required16.0 GB available

145% VRAM needed

7.2 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

5.1 tok/s

TTFT

38264 ms

Safe context

Memory

23.2 GB / 16.0 GB

Offload

30%

Memory breakdown

Weights18.3 GB

KV Cache2.4 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.6 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsNemotron 3 Nano 30B on Intel Arc A770 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 5.1 tok/s decode · 38.3s TTFT (warm) · 13 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	5.7 tok/s	18631 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	5.1 tok/s	38264 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	4.1 tok/s	68681 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	5.1 tok/s	45222 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	4.1 tok/s	85852 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Nemotron 3 Nano 30B (30B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A770 16GB (16.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	11.7 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	14.7 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on your machine.

Run

ollama run nemotron-nano:30b

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B well

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GBBudget pick

24 GB VRAM (+8)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.11 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$599 MSRP

NVIDIA A100 40GBBiggest leap

40 GB VRAM (+24)1555 GB/s (+995)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.76.7 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$10,000 MSRP

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 128GBBest value

128 GB VRAM (+112)3200 GB/s (+2640)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.118.4 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$15,000 MSRP

Gaudi 3 128GBIntel upgrade

128 GB VRAM (+112)3700 GB/s (+3140)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.152.1 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$15,000 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B?

Yes, Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B at Q2_K quantization (Runs with offload (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 23.2 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q2_K it needs only 16.6 GB. Expected decode speed: 13.6 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Nemotron 3 Nano 30B need?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B (30B parameters) requires approximately 23.2 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On Intel Arc A770 16GB, it fits at Q2_K using 16.6 GB.

What is the best quantization for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on Intel Arc A770 16GB the best fitting quantization is Q2_K, which uses 16.6 GB.

What speed will Nemotron 3 Nano 30B run at on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B achieves approximately 13.6 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 14247ms using Q2_K quantization.

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Nemotron 3 Nano 30B for coding?

For coding workloads, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on Intel Arc A770 16GB receives a F grade with 5.1 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Nemotron 3 Nano 30B use on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B can safely use up to 12K tokens of context at Q2_K quantization. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for Intel Arc A770 16GB See all hardware for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/nemotron-3-nano-30b-on-arc-a770-16gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: