Is unified memory on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB as fast as VRAM for Mistral Small 4 119B?

Not always. MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.

Can Mistral Small 4 119B run on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Mistral Small 4 119B feels slow on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

YES — With Q3_K_S

A79Great

Estimated from fit model

Mistral Small 4 119B needs ~74.9 GB VRAM. MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB has 69.1 GB. With Q3_K_S quantization, expect ~16 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Mistral Small 4 119B at Q4_K_M needs 89.2 GB — too much for MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB (69.1 GB). Runs at Q3_K_S (74.9 GB) with low quality. 2 quantization levels fit.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 89.2 GB, exceeds 69.1 GB available

89.2 GB required69.1 GB available

129% VRAM needed

20.1 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

10.9 tok/s

TTFT

17736 ms

Safe context

Memory

89.2 GB / 69.1 GB

Offload

20%

Memory breakdown

Weights72.6 GB

KV Cache5.4 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom10.4 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsMistral Small 4 119B on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 10.9 tok/s decode · 17.7s TTFT (warm) · 27 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Increase host RAM if you keep offloading

This setup may need roughly 4.5 GB of extra host RAM just for the offloaded portion, before OS and other tools.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	11.3 tok/s	9323 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	10.9 tok/s	17736 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	10.2 tok/s	27645 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	10.9 tok/s	20961 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	10.2 tok/s	34557 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Mistral Small 4 119B (119B params) fits at each quantization level on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB (69.1 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_KBest for your GPU	2	46.4 GB	Low	S88
Q3_K_S	3	58.3 GB	Low	F0

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Mistral Small 4 119B on your machine.

Run

lms load Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603 && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Mistral Small 4 119B well

MacBook Pro M3 Max 128GBBudget pick

128 GB Unified (+32)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.16 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$2,499 MSRP

Mac Studio M2 Ultra 128GBBest value

128 GB Unified (+32)800 GB/s (+400)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.30.8 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$3,999 MSRP

Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GBApple upgrade

128 GB Unified (+32)800 GB/s (+400)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.29.3 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$3,999 MSRP

AMD Instinct MI250X 128GBBiggest leap

128 GB VRAM (+32)3200 GB/s (+2800)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.108.8 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$15,000 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB run Mistral Small 4 119B?

Yes, MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB can run Mistral Small 4 119B at Q3_K_S quantization (Very compromised (needs ~4.5 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 89.2 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q3_K_S it needs only 74.9 GB. Expected decode speed: 15.8 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Mistral Small 4 119B need?

Mistral Small 4 119B (119B parameters) requires approximately 89.2 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB, it fits at Q3_K_S using 74.9 GB.

What is the best quantization for Mistral Small 4 119B?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB the best fitting quantization is Q3_K_S, which uses 74.9 GB.

What speed will Mistral Small 4 119B run at on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB?

On MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB, Mistral Small 4 119B achieves approximately 15.8 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 12257ms using Q3_K_S quantization.

Can MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB run Mistral Small 4 119B for coding?

For coding workloads, Mistral Small 4 119B on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB receives a F grade with 10.9 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Mistral Small 4 119B use on MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB?

On MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB, Mistral Small 4 119B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context at Q3_K_S quantization. The model's official context limit is 256K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for MacBook Pro M2 Max 96GB See all hardware for Mistral Small 4 119B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/mistral-small-4-119b-on-m2-max-96gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: