Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A380 6GB for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 run on Intel Arc A380 6GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 feels slow on Intel Arc A380 6GB?

Remove offload with more accelerator memory. Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

YES — With Q3_K_S

C50Usable

Estimated from fit model

Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 needs ~6.9 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A380 6GB has 6.0 GB. With Q3_K_S quantization, expect ~15 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: OffloadBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Host offload

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 at Q4_K_M needs 7.7 GB — too much for Intel Arc A380 6GB (6.0 GB). Runs at Q3_K_S (6.9 GB) with low quality. 2 quantization levels fit.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 7.7 GB, exceeds 6.0 GB available

7.7 GB required6.0 GB available

128% VRAM needed

1.7 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

10.1 tok/s

TTFT

19140 ms

Safe context

Memory

7.7 GB / 6.0 GB

Offload

20%

Memory breakdown

Weights4.3 GB

KV Cache2.0 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom0.6 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsMistral 7B Instruct v0.3 on Intel Arc A380 6GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Solve: If a train travels at 60 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?
Let me work through this step by step.

Given information:
  - Speed = 60 mph (miles per hour)
  - Time  = 2.5 hours

Formula: Distance = Speed x Time

Calculation:
  Distance = 60 mph x 2.5 h
           = 150 miles

The train travels 150 miles.

Double-check: at 60 mph the train covers 60 miles each hour. In half an hour it covers 30 miles. So in 2.5 hours: 60 + 60 + 30 = 150 miles. Confirmed.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>What if the train stops for 20 minutes halfway?
The stop doesn't change the total distance covered while moving, but it affects total trip time.

Breakdown:
  - First half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles
  - Stop: 20 minutes (no distance)
  - Second half: 1.25 hours at 60 mph = 75 miles

Total distance: 150 miles (same)
Total time: 2.5 h + 0.33 h = 2.83 hours
Average speed: 150 / 2.83 = 53 mph

The distance stays the same but average speed drops to 53 mph because of the stop.
Estimated: 10.1 tok/s decode · 19.1s TTFT (warm) · 25 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

It fits through host-memory offload, and offload is the main reason performance drops.

CPU or host-memory offload is active

About 10% of the working set spills out of accelerator memory, which usually hurts latency and sustained decode throughput.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Remove offload with more accelerator memory

Prioritize a GPU or unified-memory tier that fits the whole model natively. Removing offload usually helps more than small compute gains.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Very compromised (needs ~0.5 GB host RAM)	13.4 tok/s	7855 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	9.4 tok/s	20576 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	6.3 tok/s	44749 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	10.1 tok/s	22620 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	6.3 tok/s	55937 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (7B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A380 6GB (6.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	2.7 GB	Low	B66
Q3_K_SBest for your GPU	3	3.4 GB	Low	B66

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 on your machine.

Run

lms load Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 well

Intel Arc A580 8GBBudget pick

8 GB VRAM (+2)512 GB/s (+326)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.63.2 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$179 MSRP

Intel Arc B570 10GBBest value

10 GB VRAM (+4)380 GB/s (+194)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.51.7 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$219 MSRP

Intel Arc B580 12GBIntel upgrade

12 GB VRAM (+6)456 GB/s (+270)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.55.1 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$249 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A380 6GB run Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3?

Yes, Intel Arc A380 6GB can run Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 at Q3_K_S quantization (Very compromised (needs ~0.4 GB host RAM)). The recommended Q4_K_M requires 7.7 GB which exceeds available memory, but at Q3_K_S it needs only 6.9 GB. Expected decode speed: 14.9 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 need?

Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 (7B parameters) requires approximately 7.7 GB at Q4_K_M quantization. On Intel Arc A380 6GB, it fits at Q3_K_S using 6.9 GB.

What is the best quantization for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3?

The recommended quantization is Q4_K_M, but on Intel Arc A380 6GB the best fitting quantization is Q3_K_S, which uses 6.9 GB.

What speed will Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 run at on Intel Arc A380 6GB?

On Intel Arc A380 6GB, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 achieves approximately 14.9 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 12974ms using Q3_K_S quantization.

Can Intel Arc A380 6GB run Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 for coding?

For coding workloads, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 on Intel Arc A380 6GB receives a F grade with 9.4 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 use on Intel Arc A380 6GB?

On Intel Arc A380 6GB, Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3 can safely use up to 8K tokens of context at Q3_K_S quantization. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for Intel Arc A380 6GB See all hardware for Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.3-on-arc-a380-6gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: