Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB for Llama 3.2 11B Vision?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can Llama 3.2 11B Vision run on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Llama 3.2 11B Vision feels slow on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

Estimated from fit model

Llama 3.2 11B Vision needs ~10.5 GB but Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB only has 6.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: OllamaCapacity: No fitBandwidth: Very lowStack: BasicBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 10.5 GB, exceeds 6.0 GB available

10.5 GB required6.0 GB available

175% VRAM needed

4.5 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.5 tok/s

TTFT

55213 ms

Safe context

Memory

10.5 GB / 6.0 GB

Offload

40%

Memory breakdown

Weights6.7 GB

KV Cache2.0 GB

Runtime1.2 GB

Headroom0.6 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsLlama 3.2 11B Vision on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API.

When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed.

Key benefits of running locally:
  - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine
  - No per-token cost or rate limits
  - Works offline once the model is downloaded
  - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb:

  Model size     Q4 (4-bit)    Q8 (8-bit)    FP16
  7B params      ~4.3 GB       ~7.5 GB       ~14 GB
  13B params     ~7.9 GB       ~13.9 GB      ~26 GB
  70B params     ~42.7 GB      ~74.9 GB      ~140 GB

Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 3.5 tok/s decode · 55.2s TTFT (warm) · 9 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 10.5 GB, but this setup only exposes 6.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	4.3 tok/s	24503 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	55213 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	2.4 tok/s	115141 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	65251 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	2.4 tok/s	143926 ms	4K

Quantization options

How Llama 3.2 11B Vision (11B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB (6.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	4.3 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	5.4 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Llama 3.2 11B Vision well

Intel Arc B570 10GBBest value

10 GB VRAM (+4)380 GB/s (+188)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.21.2 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Raises estimated decode speed by about 506%.

~$219 MSRP

Intel Arc B580 12GBBudget pick

12 GB VRAM (+6)456 GB/s (+264)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.35.1 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$249 MSRP

Intel Arc A770 16GBIntel upgrade

16 GB VRAM (+10)560 GB/s (+368)

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.40.4 tok/s decode

Makes the model fit on the accelerator instead of staying completely out of reach.

Removes host-memory offload, which is usually the single biggest latency and throughput win.

~$349 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB run Llama 3.2 11B Vision?

No, Llama 3.2 11B Vision requires more memory than Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB provides.

How much VRAM does Llama 3.2 11B Vision need?

Llama 3.2 11B Vision (11B parameters) requires approximately 10.5 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Llama 3.2 11B Vision?

The recommended quantization for Llama 3.2 11B Vision is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Llama 3.2 11B Vision run at on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB?

On Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB, Llama 3.2 11B Vision achieves approximately 3.5 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 55213ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB run Llama 3.2 11B Vision for coding?

For coding workloads, Llama 3.2 11B Vision on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB receives a F grade with 3.5 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can Llama 3.2 11B Vision use on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB?

On Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB, Llama 3.2 11B Vision can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 16K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Llama 3.2 11B Vision feels slow on Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB?

See all results for Intel Arc Pro A40 6GB See all hardware for Llama 3.2 11B Vision

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/llama-3.2-11b-vision-on-arc-pro-a40-6gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: