Kimi Linear 48B A3B needs ~44.8 GB VRAM. Gaudi 3 128GB has 128.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~89 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
Fit status
Runs well
Decode
88.5 tok/s
TTFT
2189 ms
Safe context
1.0M
Memory
44.8 GB / 128.0 GB
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | A | Runs well | 88.5 tok/s | 1194 ms | 1.0M |
| Coding | A | Runs well | 88.5 tok/s | 2189 ms | 1.0M |
| Agentic Coding | A | Runs well | 88.5 tok/s | 3183 ms | 1.0M |
| Reasoning | A | Runs well | 88.5 tok/s | 2587 ms | 1.0M |
| RAG | A | Runs well | 88.5 tok/s | 3979 ms | 1.0M |
How Kimi Linear 48B A3B (48B params) fits at each quantization level on Gaudi 3 128GB (128.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 18.7 GB | Low | A71 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 23.5 GB | Low | A72 |
NVFP4 | 4 | 26.9 GB | Medium | A72 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 29.3 GB | Medium | A73 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 34.6 GB | High | A74 |
Q6_K | 6 | 39.4 GB | High | A75 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 51.4 GB | Very High | A77 |
F16Best for your GPU | 16 | 98.4 GB | Maximum | A80 |
Copy-paste commands to run Kimi Linear 48B A3B on your machine.
Run
docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \
--hf-repo "moonshotai/Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct" \
--hf-file "Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf" \
-c 4096 -ngl 99Your hardware
| Model | Params | Grade | Decode | Capabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123B | S | 37.5 tok/s | ||
| 122B | S | 104.1 tok/s | ||
| 119B | S | 112.9 tok/s | ||
| 117B | S | 39.5 tok/s | ||
| 111B | S | 41.8 tok/s |
Yes, Gaudi 3 128GB can run Kimi Linear 48B A3B with a A grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 88.5 tok/s.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B (48B parameters) requires approximately 44.8 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for Kimi Linear 48B A3B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Gaudi 3 128GB, Kimi Linear 48B A3B achieves approximately 88.5 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 2189ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, Kimi Linear 48B A3B on Gaudi 3 128GB receives a A grade with 88.5 tok/s and 1.0M context.
On Gaudi 3 128GB, Kimi Linear 48B A3B can safely use up to 1.0M tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 1.0M, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/kimi-linear-48b-a3b-on-gaudi-3-128gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview: