Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A770 16GB for Qwen3.5 4B?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can Qwen3.5 4B run on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if Qwen3.5 4B feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — Runs Great

C48Usable

Estimated from fit model

Qwen3.5 4B needs ~5.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A770 16GB has 16.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~56 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 5.4 GB, 56.0 tok/s, Runs well

5.4 GB required16.0 GB available

34% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

56.0 tok/s

TTFT

3457 ms

Safe context

378K

Memory

5.4 GB / 16.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights2.4 GB

KV Cache0.5 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.6 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsQwen3.5 4B on Intel Arc A770 16GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API.

When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed.

Key benefits of running locally:
  - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine
  - No per-token cost or rate limits
  - Works offline once the model is downloaded
  - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb:

  Model size     Q4 (4-bit)    Q8 (8-bit)    FP16
  7B params      ~4.3 GB       ~7.5 GB       ~14 GB
  13B params     ~7.9 GB       ~13.9 GB      ~26 GB
  70B params     ~42.7 GB      ~74.9 GB      ~140 GB

Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 56.0 tok/s decode · 3.5s TTFT (warm) · 140 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Runs well	56.0 tok/s	1886 ms	378K
Coding	C	Runs well	56.0 tok/s	3457 ms	378K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs well	56.0 tok/s	5029 ms	378K
Reasoning	C	Runs well	56.0 tok/s	4086 ms	378K
RAG	C	Runs well	56.0 tok/s	6286 ms	378K

Quantization options

How Qwen3.5 4B (4B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A770 16GB (16.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	1.6 GB	Low	C46
Q3_K_S	3	2.0 GB	Low	C46
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Qwen3.5 4B on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-unsloth--qwen3-5-4b-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Qwen3.5 4B well

MacBook Pro M4 Pro 24GBBudget pick

24 GB Unified (+8)

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.56 tok/s decode

~$1,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Qwen3.5 4B?

Yes, Intel Arc A770 16GB can run Qwen3.5 4B with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 56.0 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Qwen3.5 4B need?

Qwen3.5 4B (4B parameters) requires approximately 5.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Qwen3.5 4B?

The recommended quantization for Qwen3.5 4B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Qwen3.5 4B run at on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Qwen3.5 4B achieves approximately 56.0 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 3457ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A770 16GB run Qwen3.5 4B for coding?

For coding workloads, Qwen3.5 4B on Intel Arc A770 16GB receives a C grade with 56.0 tok/s and 378K context.

What context window can Qwen3.5 4B use on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

On Intel Arc A770 16GB, Qwen3.5 4B can safely use up to 378K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if Qwen3.5 4B feels slow on Intel Arc A770 16GB?

See all results for Intel Arc A770 16GB See all hardware for Qwen3.5 4B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-unsloth--qwen3-5-4b-gguf-on-arc-a770-16gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: