Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A750 8GB for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 run on Intel Arc A750 8GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 feels slow on Intel Arc A750 8GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — Tight Fit

C51Usable

Estimated from fit model

EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 needs ~7.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A750 8GB has 8.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~46 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: TightBandwidth: MediumStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 7.4 GB, 46.3 tok/s, Tight fit

7.4 GB required8.0 GB available

93% VRAM used

Fit status

Tight fit

Decode

46.3 tok/s

TTFT

4184 ms

Safe context

27K

Memory

7.4 GB / 8.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights4.8 GB

KV Cache0.9 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom0.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsEXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 on Intel Arc A750 8GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API.

When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed.

Key benefits of running locally:
  - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine
  - No per-token cost or rate limits
  - Works offline once the model is downloaded
  - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb:

  Model size     Q4 (4-bit)    Q8 (8-bit)    FP16
  7B params      ~4.3 GB       ~7.5 GB       ~14 GB
  13B params     ~7.9 GB       ~13.9 GB      ~26 GB
  70B params     ~42.7 GB      ~74.9 GB      ~140 GB

Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 46.3 tok/s decode · 4.2s TTFT (warm) · 116 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Tight fit	46.3 tok/s	2282 ms	27K
Coding	C	Tight fit	46.3 tok/s	4184 ms	27K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)	32.2 tok/s	8737 ms	27K
Reasoning	C	Tight fit	46.3 tok/s	4945 ms	27K
RAG	C	Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)	32.2 tok/s	10922 ms

Quantization options

How EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 (7.800000190734863B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A750 8GB (8.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	3.0 GB	Low	C54
Q3_K_S	3	3.8 GB	Low	C53
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-mradermacher--exaone-3-5-7-8b-instruct-i1-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 well

Intel Arc B570 10GBBudget pick

10 GB VRAM (+2)

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.43.1 tok/s decode

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$219 MSRP

Intel Arc B580 12GBBest value

12 GB VRAM (+4)

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.46 tok/s decode

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$249 MSRP

Intel Arc Pro A60 12GBIntel upgrade

12 GB VRAM (+4)

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.39.5 tok/s decode

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$499 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A750 8GB run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1?

Yes, Intel Arc A750 8GB can run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 with a C grade (Tight fit). Expected decode speed: 46.3 tok/s.

How much VRAM does EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 need?

EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 (7.800000190734863B parameters) requires approximately 7.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1?

The recommended quantization for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 run at on Intel Arc A750 8GB?

On Intel Arc A750 8GB, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 achieves approximately 46.3 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 4184ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A750 8GB run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 for coding?

For coding workloads, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 on Intel Arc A750 8GB receives a C grade with 46.3 tok/s and 27K context.

What context window can EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 use on Intel Arc A750 8GB?

On Intel Arc A750 8GB, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1 can safely use up to 27K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for Intel Arc A750 8GB See all hardware for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct i1

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-mradermacher--exaone-3-5-7-8b-instruct-i1-gguf-on-arc-a750-8gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: