Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc A550M 8GB for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct run on Intel Arc A550M 8GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct feels slow on Intel Arc A550M 8GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — Tight Fit

C49Usable

Estimated from fit model

EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct needs ~7.4 GB VRAM. Intel Arc A550M 8GB has 8.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~23 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: TightBandwidth: Very lowStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory bandwidth

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 7.4 GB, 23.1 tok/s, Tight fit

7.4 GB required8.0 GB available

93% VRAM used

Fit status

Tight fit

Decode

23.1 tok/s

TTFT

8392 ms

Safe context

27K

Memory

7.4 GB / 8.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights4.8 GB

KV Cache0.9 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom0.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsEXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct on Intel Arc A550M 8GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API.

When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed.

Key benefits of running locally:
  - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine
  - No per-token cost or rate limits
  - Works offline once the model is downloaded
  - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb:

  Model size     Q4 (4-bit)    Q8 (8-bit)    FP16
  7B params      ~4.3 GB       ~7.5 GB       ~14 GB
  13B params     ~7.9 GB       ~13.9 GB      ~26 GB
  70B params     ~42.7 GB      ~74.9 GB      ~140 GB

Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 23.1 tok/s decode · 8.4s TTFT (warm) · 58 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Very little memory headroom

You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Buy headroom, not only minimum fit

A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Tight fit	23.1 tok/s	4578 ms	27K
Coding	C	Tight fit	23.1 tok/s	8392 ms	27K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)	16.1 tok/s	17526 ms	27K
Reasoning	C	Tight fit	23.1 tok/s	9918 ms	27K
RAG	C	Runs with offload (needs ~0.2 GB host RAM)	16.1 tok/s	21907 ms

Quantization options

How EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct (7.800000190734863B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc A550M 8GB (8.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	3.0 GB	Low	C54
Q3_K_S	3	3.8 GB	Low	C53
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-lmstudio-community--exaone-3-5-7-8b-instruct-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct well

Intel Arc B570 10GBBudget pick

10 GB VRAM (+2)380 GB/s (+156)

Raises estimated decode speed by about 87%.43.1 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 87%.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$219 MSRP

Intel Arc B580 12GBBest value

12 GB VRAM (+4)456 GB/s (+232)

Raises estimated decode speed by about 99%.46 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 99%.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$249 MSRP

Intel Arc A770 16GBIntel upgrade

16 GB VRAM (+8)560 GB/s (+336)

Raises estimated decode speed by about 129%.53 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 129%.

Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.

~$349 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc A550M 8GB run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct?

Yes, Intel Arc A550M 8GB can run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct with a C grade (Tight fit). Expected decode speed: 23.1 tok/s.

How much VRAM does EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct need?

EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct (7.800000190734863B parameters) requires approximately 7.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct?

The recommended quantization for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct run at on Intel Arc A550M 8GB?

On Intel Arc A550M 8GB, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct achieves approximately 23.1 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 8392ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Intel Arc A550M 8GB run EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct for coding?

For coding workloads, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct on Intel Arc A550M 8GB receives a C grade with 23.1 tok/s and 27K context.

What context window can EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct use on Intel Arc A550M 8GB?

On Intel Arc A550M 8GB, EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct can safely use up to 27K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for Intel Arc A550M 8GB See all hardware for EXAONE 3.5 7.8B Instruct

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-lmstudio-community--exaone-3-5-7-8b-instruct-gguf-on-arc-a550m-8gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: