Is unified memory on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB as fast as VRAM for Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat?

Not always. Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB can often fit larger models thanks to unified memory, but a discrete GPU with dedicated high-bandwidth VRAM may still decode faster once the model fits. For this combination, the important distinction is capacity versus sustained throughput.

Can Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat run on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB?

YES — Runs Great

C45Usable

Estimated from fit model

Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat needs ~30.7 GB VRAM. Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB has 92.2 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~33 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 30.7 GB, 32.8 tok/s, Runs well

30.7 GB required92.2 GB available

33% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

32.8 tok/s

TTFT

5905 ms

Safe context

397K

Memory

30.7 GB / 92.2 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights13.4 GB

KV Cache2.6 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom13.8 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsCodestral 22B v0.1 IMat on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 32.8 tok/s decode · 5.9s TTFT (warm) · 82 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.

Shared-memory contention still exists

The OS, browser, and inference runtime all compete for the same physical memory pool, so real-world headroom is less forgiving than raw capacity suggests.

Best improvement path

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Runs well	32.8 tok/s	3221 ms	397K
Coding	C	Runs well	32.8 tok/s	5905 ms	397K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs well	32.8 tok/s	8589 ms	397K
Reasoning	C	Runs well	32.8 tok/s	6978 ms	397K
RAG	C	Runs well	32.8 tok/s	10736 ms	397K

Quantization options

How Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat (22B params) fits at each quantization level on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB (92.2 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	8.6 GB	Low	D39
Q3_K_S	3	10.8 GB	Low	D39
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat on your machine.

Run

lms load hf-legraphista--codestral-22b-v0-1-imat-gguf && lms server start

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat well

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 96GBBudget pick

1792 GB/s (+992)

Raises estimated decode speed by about 242%.112.2 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 242%.

~$9,999 MSRP

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition 96GBBest value

1597 GB/s (+797)

Raises estimated decode speed by about 205%.100 tok/s decode

Raises estimated decode speed by about 205%.

~$9,999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB run Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat?

Yes, Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB can run Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 32.8 tok/s.

How much VRAM does Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat need?

Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat (22B parameters) requires approximately 30.7 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat?

The recommended quantization for Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat run at on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB?

On Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB, Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat achieves approximately 32.8 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 5905ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB run Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat for coding?

For coding workloads, Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB receives a C grade with 32.8 tok/s and 397K context.

What context window can Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat use on Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB?

On Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB, Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat can safely use up to 397K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

See all results for Mac Studio M1 Ultra 128GB See all hardware for Codestral 22B v0.1 IMat

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-legraphista--codestral-22b-v0-1-imat-gguf-on-m1-ultra-128gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: