Would CUDA be a better path than Intel Arc B570 10GB for gemma 2 2b it?

Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.

Can gemma 2 2b it run on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if gemma 2 2b it feels slow on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

YES — Runs Great

C47Usable

Estimated from fit model

gemma 2 2b it needs ~3.8 GB VRAM. Intel Arc B570 10GB has 10.0 GB. With Q6_K quantization, expect ~28 tok/s.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: RoomyBandwidth: LowStack: StandardBottleneck: Balanced

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q6_K (High quality) — 3.8 GB, 28.0 tok/s, Runs well

3.8 GB required10.0 GB available

38% VRAM used

Fit status

Runs well

Decode

28.0 tok/s

TTFT

6914 ms

Safe context

441K

Memory

3.8 GB / 10.0 GB

Memory breakdown

Weights1.6 GB

KV Cache0.2 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom1.0 GB

See how fast it feels

See how fast it feelsgemma 2 2b it on Intel Arc B570 10GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>What is local AI inference?
Local AI inference means running an AI language model directly on your own hardware — your laptop, desktop, or server — instead of sending requests to a remote cloud API.

When you run inference locally the model weights are loaded into your GPU or unified memory. Each token you generate requires reading those weights from memory, so memory bandwidth is the main bottleneck for decode speed.

Key benefits of running locally:
  - Full privacy: your prompts never leave your machine
  - No per-token cost or rate limits
  - Works offline once the model is downloaded
  - Latency depends only on your hardware
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>How much VRAM do I need?
It depends on the model size and quantization level. A rough rule of thumb:

  Model size     Q4 (4-bit)    Q8 (8-bit)    FP16
  7B params      ~4.3 GB       ~7.5 GB       ~14 GB
  13B params     ~7.9 GB       ~13.9 GB      ~26 GB
  70B params     ~42.7 GB      ~74.9 GB      ~140 GB

Most people use 4-bit quantization (Q4_K_M) which gives 90-95% of full quality at a fraction of the memory. A 24 GB GPU can comfortably run most 7B-13B models.
Estimated: 28.0 tok/s decode · 6.9s TTFT (warm) · 70 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.

Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA

Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.

Best improvement path

Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance

If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	C	Runs well	28.0 tok/s	3771 ms	441K
Coding	C	Runs well	28.0 tok/s	6914 ms	441K
Agentic Coding	C	Runs well	28.0 tok/s	10057 ms	441K
Reasoning	C	Runs well	28.0 tok/s	8171 ms	441K
RAG	C	Runs well	28.0 tok/s	12571 ms	441K

Quantization options

How gemma 2 2b it (2B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc B570 10GB (10.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	0.8 GB	Low	C48
Q3_K_S	3	1.0 GB	Low	C49
NVFP4	4

Get started

Copy-paste commands to run gemma 2 2b it on your machine.

Run

docker run --rm -it ghcr.io/ggerganov/llama.cpp:full \
  --hf-repo "bartowski/gemma-2-2b-it-GGUF" \
  --hf-file "gemma-2-2b-it-GGUF-Q6_K.gguf" \
  -c 4096 -ngl 99

Upgrade options

Hardware that runs gemma 2 2b it well

MacBook Pro M4 16GBBudget pick

16 GB Unified (+6)

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.28 tok/s decode

~$599 MSRP

MacBook Air M1 16GBBest value

16 GB Unified (+6)

This setup is broadly balanced for this model.26.1 tok/s decode

~$999 MSRP

Frequently asked questions

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run gemma 2 2b it?

Yes, Intel Arc B570 10GB can run gemma 2 2b it with a C grade (Runs well). Expected decode speed: 28.0 tok/s.

How much VRAM does gemma 2 2b it need?

gemma 2 2b it (2B parameters) requires approximately 3.8 GB of memory with Q6_K quantization.

What is the best quantization for gemma 2 2b it?

The recommended quantization for gemma 2 2b it is Q6_K, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will gemma 2 2b it run at on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, gemma 2 2b it achieves approximately 28.0 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 6914ms using Q6_K quantization.

Can Intel Arc B570 10GB run gemma 2 2b it for coding?

For coding workloads, gemma 2 2b it on Intel Arc B570 10GB receives a C grade with 28.0 tok/s and 441K context.

What context window can gemma 2 2b it use on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

On Intel Arc B570 10GB, gemma 2 2b it can safely use up to 441K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is —, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if gemma 2 2b it feels slow on Intel Arc B570 10GB?

See all results for Intel Arc B570 10GB See all hardware for gemma 2 2b it

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/hf-bartowski--gemma-2-2b-it-gguf-on-arc-b570-10gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: