Can DeepSeek V3.1 671B run on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if DeepSeek V3.1 671B feels slow on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

Estimated from fit model

DeepSeek V3.1 671B needs ~479.4 GB but NVIDIA GH200 96GB only has 96.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 479.4 GB, exceeds 96.0 GB available

479.4 GB required96.0 GB available

499% VRAM needed

383.4 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

3.5 tok/s

TTFT

56108 ms

Safe context

Memory

479.4 GB / 96.0 GB

Offload

80%

Memory breakdown

Weights409.3 GB

KV Cache59.6 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom9.6 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsDeepSeek V3.1 671B on NVIDIA GH200 96GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 3.5 tok/s decode · 56.1s TTFT (warm) · 9 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 479.4 GB, but this setup only exposes 96.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	30604 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	56108 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	81611 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	66309 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	3.5 tok/s	102014 ms	4K

Quantization options

How DeepSeek V3.1 671B (671B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA GH200 96GB (96.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	261.7 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	328.8 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run DeepSeek V3.1 671B?

No, DeepSeek V3.1 671B requires more memory than NVIDIA GH200 96GB provides.

How much VRAM does DeepSeek V3.1 671B need?

DeepSeek V3.1 671B (671B parameters) requires approximately 479.4 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for DeepSeek V3.1 671B?

The recommended quantization for DeepSeek V3.1 671B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will DeepSeek V3.1 671B run at on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, DeepSeek V3.1 671B achieves approximately 3.5 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 56108ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can NVIDIA GH200 96GB run DeepSeek V3.1 671B for coding?

For coding workloads, DeepSeek V3.1 671B on NVIDIA GH200 96GB receives a F grade with 3.5 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can DeepSeek V3.1 671B use on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

On NVIDIA GH200 96GB, DeepSeek V3.1 671B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if DeepSeek V3.1 671B feels slow on NVIDIA GH200 96GB?

See all results for NVIDIA GH200 96GB See all hardware for DeepSeek V3.1 671B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/deepseek-v3.1-671b-on-gh200-96gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: