Can DeepSeek V3.1 671B run on NVIDIA B200 180GB?

Q: What should I upgrade first if DeepSeek V3.1 671B feels slow on NVIDIA B200 180GB?

Add more VRAM headroom. The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

NO — Won't Fit

F0Won't run

Estimated from fit model

DeepSeek V3.1 671B needs ~487.8 GB but NVIDIA B200 180GB only has 180.0 GB. Try a smaller quantization or lighter model.

Runtime: llama.cppCapacity: No fitBandwidth: HighStack: StandardBottleneck: Memory capacity

Operating mode

Choose the run profile you care about

Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.

Current mode

Balanced

Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.

Capabilities:

Select quantization to explore

Q4_K_M (Medium quality) — 487.8 GB, exceeds 180.0 GB available

487.8 GB required180.0 GB available

271% VRAM needed

307.8 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization

Fit status

Too heavy

Decode

7.9 tok/s

TTFT

24646 ms

Safe context

Memory

487.8 GB / 180.0 GB

Offload

60%

Memory breakdown

Weights409.3 GB

KV Cache59.6 GB

Runtime0.9 GB

Headroom18.0 GB

See how fast it feels

With memory offload — actual speed may be lower

See how fast it feelsDeepSeek V3.1 671B on NVIDIA B200 180GB
1st promptCold start — includes initialization
>Write a Python function to sort a list
Here's a Python function that sorts a list using quicksort:

def quicksort(arr):
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

# Example usage
numbers = [3, 6, 8, 10, 1, 2, 1]
print(quicksort(numbers))  # [1, 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10]

The algorithm picks a pivot, partitions the list into smaller, equal, and larger elements, then recursively sorts each partition and concatenates the results.
2nd promptWarm — model ready, no init overhead
>Now add type hints and a docstring
def quicksort(arr: list[int]) -> list[int]:
    """Sort a list using the quicksort algorithm.

    Args:
        arr: List of integers to sort.

    Returns:
        A new sorted list.
    """
    if len(arr) <= 1:
        return arr
    pivot = arr[len(arr) // 2]
    left   = [x for x in arr if x < pivot]
    middle = [x for x in arr if x == pivot]
    right  = [x for x in arr if x > pivot]
    return quicksort(left) + middle + quicksort(right)

Added type hints for the input and return type, plus a Google-style docstring.
Estimated: 7.9 tok/s decode · 24.6s TTFT (warm) · 20 tok/s prefill

What limits this setup

Usable VRAM is the main blocker for this model.

Not enough usable memory

The model needs 487.8 GB, but this setup only exposes 180.0 GB of usable VRAM.

Best improvement path

Add more VRAM headroom

The first useful upgrade is more dedicated VRAM so you can fit the model without shrinking context or dropping to a much lower quant.

Performance by workload

Workload	Grade	Fit	Decode	TTFT	Context
Chat	F	Too heavy	8.7 tok/s	12116 ms	4K
Coding	F	Too heavy	7.9 tok/s	24646 ms	4K
Agentic Coding	F	Too heavy	7.2 tok/s	39348 ms	4K
Reasoning	F	Too heavy	7.9 tok/s	29127 ms	4K
RAG	F	Too heavy	7.2 tok/s	49185 ms	4K

Quantization options

How DeepSeek V3.1 671B (671B params) fits at each quantization level on NVIDIA B200 180GB (180.0 GB usable).

Quant	Bits	VRAM	Quality	Fit
Q2_K	2	261.7 GB	Low	F0
Q3_K_S	3	328.8 GB	Low	F0
NVFP4	4

Frequently asked questions

Can NVIDIA B200 180GB run DeepSeek V3.1 671B?

No, DeepSeek V3.1 671B requires more memory than NVIDIA B200 180GB provides.

How much VRAM does DeepSeek V3.1 671B need?

DeepSeek V3.1 671B (671B parameters) requires approximately 487.8 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.

What is the best quantization for DeepSeek V3.1 671B?

The recommended quantization for DeepSeek V3.1 671B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.

What speed will DeepSeek V3.1 671B run at on NVIDIA B200 180GB?

On NVIDIA B200 180GB, DeepSeek V3.1 671B achieves approximately 7.9 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 24646ms using Q4_K_M quantization.

Can NVIDIA B200 180GB run DeepSeek V3.1 671B for coding?

For coding workloads, DeepSeek V3.1 671B on NVIDIA B200 180GB receives a F grade with 7.9 tok/s and 4K context.

What context window can DeepSeek V3.1 671B use on NVIDIA B200 180GB?

On NVIDIA B200 180GB, DeepSeek V3.1 671B can safely use up to 4K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 131K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.

What should I upgrade first if DeepSeek V3.1 671B feels slow on NVIDIA B200 180GB?

See all results for NVIDIA B200 180GB See all hardware for DeepSeek V3.1 671B

Embed this result▼

Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.

<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/deepseek-v3.1-671b-on-b200-180gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>

Preview: