Raises estimated decode speed by about 674%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
This is not only a hardware jump. It also gives you a cleaner runtime ecosystem for local LLM tooling.
~$10,000 MSRP
Aya Expanse 32B needs ~25.3 GB VRAM. Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB has 24.0 GB. With Q4_K_M quantization, expect ~9 tok/s.
Operating mode
Interactive favors responsiveness, while light API and scale-out lean harder on serving readiness. The fit stays the same, but the recommendation lens changes.
Current mode
Balanced
Balanced for general local use. Keeps the ranking neutral across personal and serving workflows.
Select quantization to explore
1.3 GB over capacity — needs offload or smaller quantization
Fit status
Runs with offload (needs ~1 GB host RAM)
Decode
9.4 tok/s
TTFT
20487 ms
Safe context
8K
Memory
25.3 GB / 24.0 GB
The raw memory story may look fine, but the software ecosystem is still a constraint here.
Very little memory headroom
You can run the model, but there is not much room left for longer context, bigger batches, extra apps, or future model updates.
Runtime ecosystem is narrower than CUDA
Intel GPUs can look attractive on memory per dollar, but local AI tooling, kernels, and model coverage are still broader and easier on CUDA today.
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance
If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Buy headroom, not only minimum fit
A slightly larger memory tier gives you safer context growth and makes the recommendation more future-proof.
| Workload | Grade | Fit | Decode | TTFT | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chat | C | Runs with offload (needs ~0 GB host RAM) | 10.5 tok/s | 10101 ms | 8K |
| Coding | C | Runs with offload (needs ~1 GB host RAM) | 9.4 tok/s | 20487 ms | 8K |
| Agentic Coding | C | Very compromised (needs ~2.6 GB host RAM) | 7.8 tok/s | 35971 ms | 8K |
| Reasoning | C | Runs with offload (needs ~1 GB host RAM) | 9.4 tok/s | 24212 ms | 8K |
| RAG | C | Very compromised (needs ~2.6 GB host RAM) | 7.8 tok/s |
How Aya Expanse 32B (32B params) fits at each quantization level on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (24.0 GB usable).
| Quant | Bits | VRAM | Quality | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2_K | 2 | 12.5 GB | Low | B56 |
Q3_K_S | 3 | 15.7 GB | Low | B55 |
NVFP4Best for your GPU |
Copy-paste commands to run Aya Expanse 32B on your machine.
Run
ollama run aya-expanse:32bUpgrade options
Raises estimated decode speed by about 674%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
This is not only a hardware jump. It also gives you a cleaner runtime ecosystem for local LLM tooling.
~$10,000 MSRP
Raises estimated decode speed by about 1095%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$15,000 MSRP
Raises estimated decode speed by about 1435%.
Adds memory headroom for longer context windows and future model growth.
~$15,000 MSRP
Yes, Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB can run Aya Expanse 32B with a C grade (Runs with offload (needs ~1 GB host RAM)). Expected decode speed: 9.4 tok/s.
Aya Expanse 32B (32B parameters) requires approximately 25.3 GB of memory with Q4_K_M quantization.
The recommended quantization for Aya Expanse 32B is Q4_K_M, which balances quality and memory efficiency.
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Aya Expanse 32B achieves approximately 9.4 tokens per second decode speed with a time-to-first-token of 20487ms using Q4_K_M quantization.
For coding workloads, Aya Expanse 32B on Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB receives a C grade with 9.4 tok/s and 8K context.
On Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, Aya Expanse 32B can safely use up to 8K tokens of context. The model's official context limit is 8K, but available memory constrains the safe maximum.
Paste this snippet into any page to show a live fit card.
<iframe src="https://willitrunai.com/embed/aya-expanse-32b-on-arc-pro-b60-24gb" width="400" height="180" frameborder="0" style="border:none;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden;" title="Will It Run AI — fit result"></iframe>
Preview:
| 44963 ms |
| 8K |
| 4 |
17.9 GB |
| Medium |
| C55 |
Q4_K_M | 4 | 19.5 GB | Medium | F0 |
Q5_K_M | 5 | 23.0 GB | High | F0 |
Q6_K | 6 | 26.2 GB | High | F0 |
Q8_0 | 8 | 34.2 GB | Very High | F0 |
F16 | 16 | 65.6 GB | Maximum | F0 |
Prefer CUDA if you want the path of least resistance. If your goal is maximum runtime coverage, easier troubleshooting, and better support for new local AI releases, CUDA is usually still the safer upgrade path.
Often yes, if your goal is the easiest setup and the widest runtime support. Intel can offer attractive memory capacity, but CUDA still tends to win on tooling maturity, guides, kernels, and model coverage for local AI.